Trends in palliative care interventions among patients with advanced bladder, prostate, or kidney cancer: A retrospective cohort study

•Palliative interventions are infrequently utilized in advanced urologic cancers.•Those with poorer survival are more likely to receive palliative interventions.•Elderly and minority patients are less likely to receive palliative interventions. Palliative care has an established role in improving th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inUrologic oncology Vol. 38; no. 11; pp. 854.e1 - 854.e9
Main Authors Lec, Patrick M., Lenis, Andrew T., Brisbane, Wayne, Sharma, Vidit, Golla, Vishnukamal, Gollapudi, Kiran, Blumberg, Jeremy, Drakaki, Alexandra, Bergman, Jonathan, Chamie, Karim
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.11.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Palliative interventions are infrequently utilized in advanced urologic cancers.•Those with poorer survival are more likely to receive palliative interventions.•Elderly and minority patients are less likely to receive palliative interventions. Palliative care has an established role in improving the quality of life in patients with advanced cancer, but little is known regarding its delivery among patients with urologic malignancies. To determine trends in the utilization of palliative interventions among patients with advanced bladder, prostate, and kidney cancer. We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients from years 2004 to 2013 in the National Cancer Database diagnosed with stage IV bladder (n = 17,997), prostate (n = 23,322), and kidney (n = 34,697) cancer, after excluding those with missing disease stage, treatment, and outcomes data. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were performed to evaluate utilization of palliative care intervention. Utilization was analyzed by cancer type and by overall survival strata (<6, 6–24, and >24 months). Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models analyzed overall survival. Palliative interventions were utilized in 12.5% (2,257/17,997), 14.7% (3,442/23,322), and 19.9% (6,935/34,697) of advanced bladder, prostate, and kidney cancer patients, respectively. Older age and longer survival were associated with lower odds of palliative intervention utilization in each malignancy, as was minority race in kidney and bladder cancer patients. Palliative radiation was used most commonly, and utilization of any palliative intervention was associated with poorer overall survival. Limitations largely stem from imperfect data abstraction, and the analysis of interventions’ incomplete reflection of palliative care. Palliative interventions were seldom used among patients with advanced urologic malignancies. Palliative interventions were less frequently used in older patients and minority races. Further study is warranted to define the role of palliative interventions in advanced urologic malignancies and guide their utilization.
ISSN:1078-1439
1873-2496
DOI:10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.04.029