Congenital abnormalities of the aortic arch: revisiting the 1964 Stewart classification
The traditional classification of congenital aortic arch abnormalities was described by James Stewart and colleagues in 1964. Since that time, advances in diagnostic imaging technology have led to better delineation of the vasculature anatomy and the identification of previously unrecognized and unc...
Saved in:
Published in | Cardiovascular pathology Vol. 39; pp. 38 - 50 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Elsevier Inc
01.03.2019
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The traditional classification of congenital aortic arch abnormalities was described by James Stewart and colleagues in 1964. Since that time, advances in diagnostic imaging technology have led to better delineation of the vasculature anatomy and the identification of previously unrecognized and unclassified anomalies. In this manuscript, we review the existing literature and propose a series of modifications to the original Stewart classification of congenital aortic arch abnormalities to incorporate this new knowledge. In brief, we propose the following modifications: (1) In Group I, we further divide subgroup B into left arch atretic and right arch atretic; (2) In Group II, we add three more subgroups, including aberrant right innominate artery, “isolated” right innominate artery (RIA), “isolated” right carotid artery with aberrant right subclavian artery; (3) In Groups I, II, and III, we add a subgroup of absence of both ductus arteriosus; and (4) In Group IV, we add three subgroups, including circumflex retro-esophageal aorta arch, persistent V aortic arch, and anomalous origin of pulmonary artery from ascending aorta.
•Given recent advances in diagnostic imaging technology and the identification of previously unrecognized anomalies, we propose a series of modifications to the original Stewart classification of congenital aortic arch abnormalities.•This revised classification will provide additional information that can be used to counseling patients and to develop appropriate evidence-based postnatal management recommendations. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 ObjectType-Review-1 |
ISSN: | 1054-8807 1879-1336 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.carpath.2018.11.004 |