Hospital lung surgery volume and patient outcomes

•Historical data suggests an association between survival and the number of surgeries done at a hospital.•In our Australian study, we found no evidence of survival differences in patients between low- and high-volume hospitals for lung cancer surgery.•A higher proportion of patients had an ICU admis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inLung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Vol. 129; pp. 22 - 27
Main Authors Thai, A.A., Stuart, E., te Marvelde, L., Milne, R.L., Knight, S., Whitfield, K., Mitchell, P.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Ireland Elsevier B.V 01.03.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Historical data suggests an association between survival and the number of surgeries done at a hospital.•In our Australian study, we found no evidence of survival differences in patients between low- and high-volume hospitals for lung cancer surgery.•A higher proportion of patients had an ICU admission ≥24 h in lower volume centres. There has been evidence of an association between patient outcomes and the number of surgeries performed at a hospital. To our knowledge, there are no Australian data on hospital cancer surgery volumes and patient outcomes. We evaluated the relationship between hospital non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) surgery volume and patient outcomes in Victoria. Patients with a primary diagnosis of NSCLC between 2008 and 2014 were identified in the Victorian Cancer Registry (n = 15,369), 3,420 (22%) of whom had lung cancer surgery. Primary outcome was death within 90 days of surgery and secondary outcomes included overall survival, use of postoperative ventilation and ≥24hours spent in ICU. Hospital volume was measured as the average number of lung surgeries performed per year, with quartiles Q1: 1–17, Q2: 18–34, Q3: 35–58 and Q4: 59 + . 57% (1,941/3,420) lung cancer patients underwent lobectomy, 38% (1,299/3,420) sub-lobar resection and 5% (180/3,420) pneumonectomy. The overall 90-day mortality after lung surgery was 3.5%, and was 2.6% and 4.5% for patients undergoing lobectomy and sub-lobar resection respectively. There was no difference in 90-day mortality and overall survival between low- and high-volume centres regardless of procedure. Patients operated on in lower volume centres had more admissions to ICU ≥24hours (Q1. 55% vs. Q4. 11%, p-trend <0.001). A higher proportion of patients attending private hospitals (19%) had an ASA score of 4 compared with patients attending a public hospital (9%). We observed no evidence of survival differences between lung cancer patients attending low- and high-volume hospitals for cancer surgery. A higher proportion of patients had an ICU admission ≥24hours in lower volume centres and there are a higher proportion of patients with an ASA score of 4 in private hospitals compared to public hospitals.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0169-5002
1872-8332
DOI:10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.01.002