Oral maintenance metronomic vinorelbine versus best supportive care in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer after platinum-based chemotherapy: The MA.NI.LA. multicenter, randomized, controlled, phase II trial

•This trial assessed switched-maintenance oral metronomic vinorelbine (OMV) in NSCLC.•Patients who had not progressed after 1st-line Pt-based chemotherapy were enrolled.•Patients were randomized to OMV or best supportive care (BSC).•OMV prolonged PFS compared to BSC.•The optimal dose of OMV requires...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inLung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Vol. 132; pp. 17 - 23
Main Authors Platania, Marco, Pasini, Felice, Porcu, Luca, Boeri, Mattia, Verderame, Francesco, Modena, Yasmina, Del Conte, Alessandro, Nichetti, Federico, Garassino, Marina Chiara, Martinetti, Antonia, Sottotetti, Elisa, Cavanna, Luigi, Vattemi, Emanuela, Pozzessere, Daniele, Bertolini, Alessandro, Irtelli, Luciana, Verri, Carla, Sozzi, Gabriella, Proto, Claudia, Pastorino, Ugo, Torri, Valter, Fraccon, Anna Paola, Spinnato, Francesca, Signorelli, Diego, Lo Russo, Giuseppe, Tuzi, Alessandro, Gallucci, Rosaria, Cinieri, Saverio, Mencoboni, Manlio, Antonelli, Paola, Giacomelli, Luca, de Braud, Filippo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Ireland Elsevier B.V 01.06.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•This trial assessed switched-maintenance oral metronomic vinorelbine (OMV) in NSCLC.•Patients who had not progressed after 1st-line Pt-based chemotherapy were enrolled.•Patients were randomized to OMV or best supportive care (BSC).•OMV prolonged PFS compared to BSC.•The optimal dose of OMV requires further investigation. Oral vinorelbine administered at the maximum tolerated dose has already showed activity and a good safety profile in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The MA.NI.LA study was a phase II, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial that aimed to assess the effects of a ‘switched maintenance’ regimen with oral metronomic vinorelbine (OMV) in patients with NSCLC who had not progressed after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either OMV (50 mg three-times weekly) as maintenance treatment or best supportive care (BSC). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective disease control rate (DCR, CR + PR + SD), safety and quality of life. In total, 61 and 59 patients were assigned to OMV and BSC, respectively. At a median follow-up of 23.9 (IQR 10.2–38.2) months, patients treated with OMV reported a significantly lower progression rate compared to patient in the BSC arm (89% [54/61] vs 96% [56/58]; HR 0.73; 90% CI 0.53-0.999, p = 0.049). Median PFS for patients treated with vinorelbine was 4.3 months (95% CI 2.8–5.6) vs 2.8 months (95% CI 1.9–4.5) for patients receiving BSC. This benefit was specifically evident in patients aged ≥70 years, in current smokers, and in those who reported disease stabilization as best response to induction chemotherapy. OS and response rate and quality of life were similar in the two arms. Drop-out rate for major toxicity with OMV was unexpectedly high (25%, 14/61) mainly due to grade 3–4 neutropenia (11%, 7/61). Conclusions In patients with unselected NSCLC achieving disease control after platinum-based chemotherapy switch maintenance therapy with OMV prolonged PFS compared to BSC; however, the optimal dose of OMV requires further investigation.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
ObjectType-News-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0169-5002
1872-8332
DOI:10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.04.001