An Algorithm to Evaluate Methodological Rigor and Risk of Bias in Single-Case Studies

• Published in: Behavior modification Vol. 47; no. 6; pp. 1482 - 1509
• Main Authors: Perdices, Michael, Tate, Robyn L., Rosenkoetter, Ulrike
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.11.2023; SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC
• Subjects: Algorithms; Case Studies; Internal validity; Mathematics; risk of bias; methodological quality; internal validity; Risk of Bias in N-of-1 Trials (RoBiNT) Scale; single-case studies; critical appraisal scales
• ISSN: 0145-4455; 1552-4167
• DOI: 10.1177/0145445519863035

Critical appraisal scales play an important role in evaluating methodological rigor (MR) of between-groups and single-case designs (SCDs). For intervention research this forms an essential basis for ascertaining the strength of evidence. Yet, few such scales provide classifications that take into account the differential weighting of items contributing to internal validity. This study aimed to develop an algorithm derived from the Risk of Bias in N-of-1 Trials (RoBiNT) Scale to classify MR and risk of bias magnitude in SCDs. The algorithm was applied to 46 SCD experiments. Two experiments (4%) were classified as Very High MR, 14 (30%) as High, 5 (11%) as Moderate, 2 (4%) as Fair, 2 (4%) as Low, and 21 (46%) as Very Low. These proportions were comparable to the What Works Clearinghouse classifications: 13 (28%) met standards, 8 (17%) met standards with reservations, and 25 (54%) did not meet standards. There was strong association between the two classification systems.