Type A acute aortic dissection with ≥40-mm aortic root: results of conservative and replacement strategies at long-term follow-up

• Published in: European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery Vol. 59; no. 5; pp. 1115 - 1122
• Main Authors: Vendramin, Igor, Lechiancole, Andrea, Piani, Daniela, Deroma, Laura, Tullio, Annarita, Sponga, Sandro, Milano, Aldo D, Onorati, Francesco, Bortolotti, Uberto, Livi, Ugolino
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Germany Oxford University Press 08.05.2021
• Subjects: Ascending aorta; Acute aortic dissection; Modified Bentall procedure; Aortic root
• ISSN: 1010-7940; 1873-734X
• DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa456

Abstract   OBJECTIVES We evaluated the long-term results of aortic root (AR) preservation and replacement in patients operated on for acute type A aortic dissection. METHODS Out of 302 patients discharged after repair of acute aortic dissection (1977–2019), 124 patients had an AR ≥40 mm, which was preserved in 84 (68%, group A) patients and replaced in 40 (32%, group B) patients. Group B patients were younger (mean age 57 ± 12 vs 62 ± 11 years, P = 0.07), with a mean AR of 47 vs 43 mm and ≥moderate aortic insufficiency in 65% vs 30%. Survival, causes of death and reoperations were analysed at mean follow-up of 9 ± 8 years (6 months to 40 years). RESULTS Actuarial survival of discharged patients at 5, 10 and 15 years was 97% (0.89–0.99), 78% (0.67–0.90) and 75% (0.64–0.88) in group A, and 85% (0.71–0.95), 62% (0.44–0.78) and 57% (0.39–0.76) in group B (log-rank test P = 0.2). Nine patients in group A (7 patients for aortic insufficiency and dilatation of the root and 2 patients for pseudoaneurysm) and 1 patient of group B (pseudoaneurysm of the right coronary button) required proximal reoperation without deaths. At 5, 10 and 15 years, the cumulative incidence of proximal aortic reoperations was 5%, 9% and 25% in group A, and 0%, 3% and 3% in group B (P = 0.02). At multivariable analysis AR >45 mm [hazard ratio (HR) 6.8, P = 0.026] and age (HR 0.9, P = 0.016) were independently associated with proximal reoperation. CONCLUSIONS AR preservation in acute type A dissection showed acceptable long-term outcomes. Nevertheless, a more aggressive approach appears a valid option, especially in patients with AR diameter >45 mm.