Towards a global consensus on GDM diagnosis: Light at the end of the tunnel?

The diagnostic criteria for GDM continue to be debated. The arguments presented here may help to dissipate confusion and help build global consensus.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of gynecology and obstetrics Vol. 149; no. 3; pp. 257 - 261
Main Authors Kapur, Anil, McIntyre, H. David, Divakar, Hema, Di Renzo, Gian Carlo, Kihara, Anne Beatrice, McAuliffe, Fionnuala, Hanson, Mark, Ma, Ronald C., Hod, Moshe, Bolatti, Hector, Roura, Luis Cabero, D’Alton, Mary, Dao, Blami, Desoye, Gernot, Dunn, Fidelma, Mahmood, Tahir, Momtaz, Mohamed, Simeoni, Umbeto, Yang, Huixia, Visser, Gerard, Ferede, Yirgu Gebrehiwot
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.06.2020
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:The diagnostic criteria for GDM continue to be debated. The arguments presented here may help to dissipate confusion and help build global consensus.
Bibliography:FIGO Working Group on Hyperglycemia in Pregnancy (2015–2018) members are listed at the end of the paper.
SourceType-Other Sources-1
content type line 63
ObjectType-Editorial-2
ObjectType-Commentary-1
ISSN:0020-7292
1879-3479
DOI:10.1002/ijgo.13149