A working guide to harnessing generalized dissimilarity modelling for biodiversity analysis and conservation assessment

• Published in: Global ecology and biogeography Vol. 31; no. 4; pp. 802 - 821
• Main Authors: Mokany, Karel, Ware, Chris, Woolley, Skipton N. C., Ferrier, Simon, Fitzpatrick, Matthew C., Bahn, Volker
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.04.2022
• Subjects: Assessments; beta diversity; Biodiversity; biodiversity conservation; biogeography; compositional turnover; Conservation; distance; Environmental gradient; GDM; generalized dissimilarity modelling; Mathematical models; Modelling; R&D; Research & development; research and development; site‐pair; Spatial analysis; species diversity; Wildlife conservation
• ISSN: 1466-822X; 1466-8238
• DOI: 10.1111/geb.13459

Aim Generalized dissimilarity modelling (GDM) is a powerful and unique method for characterizing and predicting beta diversity, the change in biodiversity over space, time and environmental gradients. The number of studies applying GDM is expanding, with increasing recognition of its value in improving our understanding of the drivers of biodiversity patterns and in implementing a wide variety of spatial assessments relevant to biodiversity conservation. However, apart from the original presentation of the GDM technique, there has been little guidance available to users on applying GDM to different situations or on the key modelling decisions required. Innovation We present an accessible working guide to GDM. We describe the context for the development of GDM, present a simple statistical explanation of how model fitting works, and step through key considerations involved in data preparation, model fitting, refinement and assessment. We then describe how several novel spatial biodiversity analyses can be implemented using GDM, with code to support broader implementation. We conclude by providing an overview of the range of GDM‐based analyses that have been undertaken to date and identify priority areas for future research and development. Main conclusions Our vision is that this working guide will facilitate greater and more rigorous use of GDM as a powerful tool for undertaking biodiversity analyses and assessments.