Placebo analgesia and nocebo hyperalgesia in patients with Alzheimer disease and healthy participants
Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. AbstractThe role of placebo analgesia and nocebo hyperalgesia in patients with Alzheimer disease (AD) is largely unknown, with only few studies in the area. Therefore, this study aims to investigate to which extent placebo analgesia and nocebo h...
Saved in:
Published in | Pain (Amsterdam) Vol. 165; no. 2; pp. 440 - 449 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Philadelphia, PA
Wolters Kluwer
01.02.2024
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.
AbstractThe role of placebo analgesia and nocebo hyperalgesia in patients with Alzheimer disease (AD) is largely unknown, with only few studies in the area. Therefore, this study aims to investigate to which extent placebo analgesia and nocebo hyperalgesia effects are present in patients experiencing mild-to-moderate AD. Twenty-one patients with AD (test population) and 26 healthy participants (HP; design validation) were exposed to thermal pain stimulation on 3 test days: Lidocaine condition (open/hidden lidocaine administration), capsaicin condition (open/hidden capsaicin administration), and natural history (no treatment), in a randomized, within-subject design. Open lidocaine and open capsaicin were accompanied by verbal suggestions for pain relief and pain increase, respectively. Expected pain and actual pain intensity were measured on a numerical rating scale (0-10). Placebo and nocebo effects were calculated as pain differences in open-hidden lidocaine and capsaicin, respectively, controlled for no treatment. Healthy participants obtained a placebo effect (P = 0.01) and a trend for a nocebo effect (P = 0.07). Patients with AD did not obtain a placebo effect (P = 0.44) nor a significant nocebo effect (P = 0.86). Healthy participants expected lower and higher pain with open vs hidden lidocaine and capsaicin, respectively (P < 0.001). The same expectation effects were seen in patients with AD (open vs hidden lidocaine, P = 0.008; open vs hidden capsaicin, P < 0.001). With a well-controlled experimental setting, this study suggests that patients with AD may not experience placebo analgesia effects. Nocebo hyperalgesia effects in patients with AD needs further research. These findings may have implications for the conduction of clinical trials and the treatment of patients with AD in clinical practice. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Corresponding author. Address: Division for Psychology and Neuroscience, Department of Psychology and Behavioral Science, School of Business and Social Sciences, Aarhus University, Denmark. Tel.: +4550941789. E-mail address: susanmatthiesen@outlook.com (S. T. Matthiesen).Sponsorships or competing interests that may be relevant to content are disclosed at the end of this article.Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text and are provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal's Web site (www.painjournalonline.com). ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
ISSN: | 0304-3959 1872-6623 1872-6623 |
DOI: | 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003035 |