The Alfred Health post‐COVID‐19 service, Melbourne, 2020–2022: an observational cohort study

• Published in: Medical journal of Australia Vol. 220; no. 2; pp. 91 - 96
• Main Authors: Holland, Anne E, Fineberg, Daniel, Marceau, Tunya, Chong, Melissa, Beaman, Jessica, Wilson, Lisa, Buchanan, Jo‐Anne, Uren, Jacqueline, Dal Corso, Simone, Lannin, Natasha A, Hoffman, Mariana, Mellerick, Christie R, Fernando, Kathya, Bondarenko, Janet
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Australia 05.02.2024
• Subjects: Cohort Studies; COVID-19 - epidemiology; COVID-19 - therapy; COVID‐19; Dyspnea; Fatigue; Health services research; Humans; Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome; Quality of Life; Referral and consultation; SARS‐CoV‐2; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Referral and consultation; Health services research
• ISSN: 0025-729X; 1326-5377
• DOI: 10.5694/mja2.52192

Objectives To determine the uptake of the Alfred Health Post‐COVID service among people hospitalised with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) or referred by general practitioners; to describe their characteristics and symptoms at eight weeks and the clinical services they required. Study design Observational cohort study. Setting Outpatient post‐COVID‐19 follow‐up service in a tertiary Melbourne hospital. Participants All people admitted to Alfred Health (inpatients, hospital‐in‐the‐home) with COVID‐19, 19 March 2020 – 28 December 2022; people with persistent symptoms referred by general practitioners in the Alfred Health catchment area during 2022. Intervention Questionnaire‐based symptom assessment eight weeks after onset of COVID‐19. Dyspnoea, fatigue, depression, anxiety, and post‐traumatic stress disorder were assessed with standardised tools, as were health status and health‐related quality of life; return to work or study, weight loss, and altered cognition and memory were also assessed. Screening was followed by physical assessment and management at the service (specialist general medicine review, physiotherapist, allied health assistant, neuropsychologist) and referral to other specialist medical services as required. Main outcome measures Proportion of eligible people who used the service for follow‐up at eight weeks; proportions of service users who reported symptoms and return to pre‐COVID‐19 employment or study; clinical services required by service users. Results Of 6712 people invited for screening, 726 completed questionnaires (11%). At least one persistent symptom was reported by 385 of 642 respondents (60% of respondents, 5.7% of invitees), most frequently memory (371 of 656, 57%) or concentration problems (431 of 656, 66%), dyspnoea (197 of 703, 28%), and extreme fatigue (189 of 673, 28%). Sixty‐seven of 453 respondents had not returned to pre‐COVID‐19 work or study (15%). People were referred to a variety of medical and non‐medical services for management, including specialist medical clinics, allied health, and rehabilitation. Among 71 people who also completed questionnaires at twelve months, the proportions who reported fatigue, anxiety, and memory and concentration changes were similar at both assessments. Conclusions After acute COVID‐19 that required hospital admission or was followed by persistent symptoms in community care, a small proportion of people (5.7%) reported symptoms that required medical and allied health specialist assessment and management. Our findings may assist planning services for people with long COVID.