Comparison of Aptamer-Based and Antibody-Based Assays for Protein Quantification in Chronic Kidney Disease

Novel aptamer-based technologies can identify >7000 analytes per sample, offering a high-throughput alternative to traditional immunoassays in biomarker discovery. However, the specificity for distinct proteins has not been thoroughly studied in the context of CKD. We assessed the use of SOMAscan...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology Vol. 17; no. 3; pp. 350 - 360
Main Authors Lopez-Silva, Carolina, Surapaneni, Aditya, Coresh, Josef, Reiser, Jochen, Parikh, Chirag R, Obeid, Wassim, Grams, Morgan E, Chen, Teresa K
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States American Society of Nephrology 01.03.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Novel aptamer-based technologies can identify >7000 analytes per sample, offering a high-throughput alternative to traditional immunoassays in biomarker discovery. However, the specificity for distinct proteins has not been thoroughly studied in the context of CKD. We assessed the use of SOMAscan, an aptamer-based technology, for the quantification of eight immune activation biomarkers and cystatin C among 498 African American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension (AASK) participants using immunoassays as the gold standard. We evaluated correlations of serum proteins as measured by SOMAscan versus immunoassays with each other and with iothalamate-measured GFR. We then compared associations between proteins measurement with risks of incident kidney failure and all-cause mortality. Six biomarkers (IL-8, soluble TNF receptor superfamily member 1B [TNFRSF1B], cystatin C, soluble TNF receptor superfamily member 1A [TNFRSF1A], IL-6, and soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor [suPAR]) had non-negligible correlations ( =0.94, 0.93, 0.89, 0.85, 0.46, and 0.23, respectively) between SOMAscan and immunoassay measurements, and three (IL-10, IFN- , and TNF- ) were uncorrelated ( =0.08, 0.07, and 0.02, respectively). Of the six biomarkers with non-negligible correlations, TNFRSF1B, cystatin C, TNFRSF1A, and suPAR were negatively correlated with measured GFR and associated with higher risk of kidney failure. IL-8, TNFRSF1B, cystatin C, TNFRSF1A, and suPAR were associated with a higher risk of mortality both methods. On average, immunoassay measurements were more strongly associated with adverse outcomes than their SOMAscan counterparts. SOMAscan is an efficient and relatively reliable technique for quantifying IL-8, TNFRSF1B, cystatin C, and TNFRSF1A in CKD and detecting their potential associations with clinical outcomes. This article contains a podcast at https://www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/CJASN/2022_02_23_CJN11700921.mp3.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1555-9041
1555-905X
DOI:10.2215/cjn.11700921