Non‐invasive brain stimulation in modulation of mental rotation ability: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Mental rotation, the ability to manipulate mental images, is an important function in human cognition. This systematic review and meta‐analysis investigates the potential of non‐invasive brain stimulation in modulation of this component of visuo‐spatial perception. The PubMed database was reviewed p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe European journal of neuroscience Vol. 54; no. 10; pp. 7493 - 7512
Main Authors Veldema, Jitka, Gharabaghi, Alireza, Jansen, Petra
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chichester Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.11.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Mental rotation, the ability to manipulate mental images, is an important function in human cognition. This systematic review and meta‐analysis investigates the potential of non‐invasive brain stimulation in modulation of this component of visuo‐spatial perception. The PubMed database was reviewed prior to 31 September 2020 on randomized controlled trials investigating the effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on the mental rotation ability in healthy persons. A total of 17 studies (including 485 subjects) matched our inclusion criteria. Within their scope, overall, 46 sham‐controlled experiments were performed. Methodology and results of each experiment are presented in a meta‐analysis. The data show a large variety of methods and effects. The influence of (1) stimulation‐technique (tDCS, tACS, and rTMS), (2) stimulation protocol (anodal, cathodal, bilateral tDCS, tACS, high‐frequency rTMS, low‐frequency rTMS, paired pulse rTMS, and theta burst stimulation), (3) stimulation timing (preconditioning and simultaneous), (4) stimulation location (left, right hemisphere, frontal, and parietal area), and (5) stimulus type (bodily and non‐bodily) is discussed. The data indicate a beneficial effect of anodal tDCS and of tACS and no effect of cathodal tDCS on the mental rotation ability. Bilateral tDCS protocols both improved and worsened the parameters assessed. The small effect sizes obtained in mostly rTMS experiments require cautious interpretation.
Bibliography:Edited by: John Foxe
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0953-816X
1460-9568
DOI:10.1111/ejn.15490