Do regeneration traits vary according to vegetation structure? A case study for savannas

Aim Regeneration traits are crucial for understanding patterns and processes in plant communities. However, regeneration traits are not reported much in community ecology, preventing a better assessment of trait‐based community assembly. Here we assessed habitat‐related regeneration traits by compar...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of vegetation science Vol. 32; no. 1
Main Authors Escobar, Diego F E, Silveira, Fernando A O, Morellato, Leonor Patricia C, Henrik Bruun, Hans
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.01.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Aim Regeneration traits are crucial for understanding patterns and processes in plant communities. However, regeneration traits are not reported much in community ecology, preventing a better assessment of trait‐based community assembly. Here we assessed habitat‐related regeneration traits by comparing species from open (grassland and shrubland) and closed (woodland) Brazilian savannas (cerrado). Location Our study site comprised two cerrado areas in southeastern Brazil that range from open to closed vegetation types, as examples of an ecological gradient of resources and environmental conditions. Methods We classified 82 species according to dormancy (non‐dormant, physiological, physical, physiophysical, morphological, and morphophysiological dormancy), dispersal syndrome (autochory, anemochory, exozoochory, endozoochory), and dispersal season (rainy, dry, rainy‐to‐dry and dry‐to‐rainy transitions). We determined seed mass, germination percentage, mean germination time and coefficient of variation of germination time in conditions of optimal temperatures. Principal coordinates Analysis (PCoA) was used to explore the relationships between regeneration traits and vegetation types. Results The two main axes of the PCoA explained 38% of the total variance. The first axis was related to germination traits (germination percentage, mean gemination time, and coefficient of variation of gemination time) and separated dormant from non‐dormant species, whereas the second axis was related to seed mass, growth form, and dispersal syndromes which sharply separated open‐ and closed‐savanna species. Unexpectedly, seed germination and dormancy traits did not differ among open‐ and closed‐savanna species. Conclusions Seasonality is a strong filter for both germination and seedling establishment that shapes germination strategies regardless of vegetation type. The dominant strategy was dispersal of non‐dormant seeds in the rainy season, while the least common strategy was dispersal of dormant seeds during the rainy‐to‐dry season transition. Habitat‐related germination strategies were related to growth form and seed mass, improving our understanding of community assembly in species‐rich Brazilian savannas. Regeneration traits are key to understanding plant distribution patterns and community assembly. Here we compare seed‐based regeneration traits between two contrasting Brazilian savanna physiognomies and test whether germination strategies are shaped by seasonality and environmental stochasticity. We show that seasonality is a strong filter shaping germination strategies regardless of vegetation type. In open and closed savannas, fine‐tuning seed dispersal with the onset of the rainy season was the dominant regeneration strategy.
Bibliography:Funding information
This work was supported by FAPESP, the São Paulo Research Foundation (grants #2013/50155‐0 and #2010/51307‐0) to LPCM and a FAPESP doctoral scholarship (grants #2014/21430–6 and #2017/27100‐6) to DFEE. FAOS and LPCM received a productivity scholarship from the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development — CNPq (#311820/2018‐2). The study was benefited by a FAPEMIG research grant to FAOS and by support from the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) to the “Programa de Pós‐graduação em Biologia Vegetal”, IB ‐ UNESP (Finance Code 001).
ObjectType-Case Study-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Feature-4
ObjectType-Report-1
ObjectType-Article-3
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1100-9233
1654-1103
DOI:10.1111/jvs.12940