Resective Surgery versus Debridement in Stage 2 Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw

The aim of this study is to analyze surgical and functional outcomes in order to verify the applicability of surgical treatment guidelines as foreseen by MASCC/ISOO/ASCO 2019. Patients affected by stage 2 MRONJ refractory to conservative management were grouped if underwent surgical resection (Group...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inApplied sciences Vol. 11; no. 18; p. 8553
Main Authors D’Amato, Salvatore, Troiano, Antonio, Lo Giudice, Giorgio, De Cicco, Davide, Rusciano, Mario, Tartaro, Gianpaolo, Colella, Giuseppe
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Basel MDPI AG 01.09.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The aim of this study is to analyze surgical and functional outcomes in order to verify the applicability of surgical treatment guidelines as foreseen by MASCC/ISOO/ASCO 2019. Patients affected by stage 2 MRONJ refractory to conservative management were grouped if underwent surgical resection (Group A) or debridement (Group B). Health-related quality of life was evaluated by using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer questionnaires, QLQ-C30 and H&N35. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon/Mann–Whitney test, Kaplan–Meier test, Cox regression model and Cox multivariate regression. Group A showed higher complete healing cases vs. group B. Recurrence rate difference in group A vs. group B was statistically significant. Debridement is an unfavorable prognostic factor when compared to surgical resection (p = 0.0032, HR 4.9). Quality of life mean values showed a marked improvement in Group A and a slight improvement in Group B. Debridement has 4.9 times more risk to develop recurrence when compared to surgical resection. A more satisfactory quality of life was shown in patients subject to resective surgery with an improving trend from baseline. Debridement patients showed more variability of results and an overall negative trend at the end of the 6-month follow-up.
ISSN:2076-3417
2076-3417
DOI:10.3390/app11188553