Comparison of Two Approaches to GNSS Positioning Using Code Pseudoranges Generated by Smartphone Device

The release of Android 7.0 has made raw GNSS positioning data available on smartphones and, as a result, this has allowed many experiments to be developed to evaluate the quality of GNSS positioning using mobile devices. This paper investigates the best positioning, using pseudorange measurement in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inApplied sciences Vol. 11; no. 11; p. 4787
Main Authors Pepe, Massimiliano, Costantino, Domenica, Vozza, Gabriele, Alfio, Vincenzo Saverio
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Basel MDPI AG 01.06.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The release of Android 7.0 has made raw GNSS positioning data available on smartphones and, as a result, this has allowed many experiments to be developed to evaluate the quality of GNSS positioning using mobile devices. This paper investigates the best positioning, using pseudorange measurement in the Differential Global Navigation Satellite System (DGNSS) and Single Point Positioning (SPP), obtained by smartphones. The experimental results show that SPP can be comparable to the DGNSS solution and can generally achieve an accuracy of one meter in planimetric positioning; in some conditions, an accuracy of less than one meter was achieved in the Easting coordinate. As far as altimetric positioning is concerned, it has been demonstrated that DGNSS is largely preferable to SPP. The aim of the research is to introduce a statistical method to evaluate the accuracy and precision of smartphone positioning that can be applied to any device since it is based only on the pseudoranges of the code. In order to improve the accuracy of positioning from mobile devices, two methods (Tukey and K-means) were used and applied, as they can detect and eliminate outliers in the data. Finally, the paper shows a case study on how the implementation of SPP on GIS applications for smartphones could improve citizen science experiments.
ISSN:2076-3417
2076-3417
DOI:10.3390/app11114787