Measurement of bacterial collision efficiencies in porous media

A new method, utilizing radiolabeled ( 3H-leucine) cells and 1-cm columns packed with 40-μm borosilicate glass beads was used to estimate bacterial collision efficiency by directly measuring the retention of cells in porous media. At a fractional retention of 0.051 ( n = 3), the coefficient of varia...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWater research (Oxford) Vol. 29; no. 4; pp. 1151 - 1158
Main Authors Gross, Mark J., Albinger, Otto, Jewett, David G., Logan, Bruce E., Bales, Roger C., Arnold, Robert G.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Elsevier Ltd 1995
Elsevier Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A new method, utilizing radiolabeled ( 3H-leucine) cells and 1-cm columns packed with 40-μm borosilicate glass beads was used to estimate bacterial collision efficiency by directly measuring the retention of cells in porous media. At a fractional retention of 0.051 ( n = 3), the coefficient of variation was 0.037, permitting meaningful estimation of collision efficiencies as low as 3 × 10 −5. Collision efficiency was a function of the ionic strength and pecies identity; α increased from 1.6 × 10 −3 to 1.4 × 10 −2 for A. paradoxus in 10 −5 and 10 −3 M NaCl solutions, respectively, and from 8.9 × 10 −3 to 6.2 × 10 −2 for P. fluorescens in the same solutions. Results were not sensitive to test parameters such as velocity, volume filtered and rinse volume. The new procedure provides a convenient, reliable, accurate method for estimating low-end biocolloid collision efficiencies in porous media. In the range α < 0.01, the method is economical, significantly faster, and much more reliable than other published procedures. Its application may accelerate efforts to establish functional relationships between biocolloid collision efficiency and governing physical-chemical variables.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0043-1354
1879-2448
DOI:10.1016/0043-1354(94)00235-Y