From constants to consequence, and back
Bolzano's definition of consequence in effect associates with each set X of symbols (in a given interpreted language) a consequence relation ⇒x. We present this in a precise and abstract form, in particular studying minimal sets of symbols generating ⇒x. Then we present a method for going in th...
Saved in:
Published in | Synthese (Dordrecht) Vol. 187; no. 3; pp. 957 - 971 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Dordrecht
Springer
01.08.2012
Springer Netherlands Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Bolzano's definition of consequence in effect associates with each set X of symbols (in a given interpreted language) a consequence relation ⇒x. We present this in a precise and abstract form, in particular studying minimal sets of symbols generating ⇒x. Then we present a method for going in the other direction: extracting from an arbitrary consequence relation ⇒ its associated set C⇒ of constants. We show that this returns the expected logical constants from familiar consequence relations, and that, restricting attention to sets of symbols satisfying a strong minimality condition, there is an isomorphism between the set of strongly minimal sets of symbols and the set of corresponding consequence relations (both ordered under inclusion). |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
ISSN: | 0039-7857 1573-0964 1573-0964 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11229-011-9902-z |