Audience Costs, Information, and Credible Commitment Problems

• Published in: The Journal of conflict resolution Vol. 60; no. 3; pp. 434 - 458
• Main Authors: Moon, Chungshik, Souva, Mark
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.04.2016; SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC
• Subjects: Armed conflict; Audiences; Capacity costs; Commitments; Conflict resolution; Cost analysis; Credible commitment; Democracy; Dyadics; Escalation; International conflict; International disputes; Management of crises; Reciprocatory motion; Research design; Studies; Territorial disputes; Variable costs; audience costs; credible commitments; information; crisis bargaining
• ISSN: 0022-0027; 1552-8766
• DOI: 10.1177/0022002714545222

Leaders who can accumulate audience costs can send costly signals that may help alleviate information problems associated with crisis escalation. We argue that research examining the effect of audience costs fails to appreciate the theoretical context in which audience costs matter. Audience costs may help alleviate information problems associated with international conflict. However, credible commitment problems are more central than information problems for some international conflicts. Theory does not expect audience costs to matter in this context; as a result, extant tests, and many criticisms, of the effect of audience costs on crisis escalation are flawed. We offer a more appropriate test of the effect of audience costs on crisis escalation. Consistent with extant theoretical arguments, we find that audience costs only reduce the likelihood of conflict when credible commitment problems are not the dominant concern motivating a dispute or crisis.