Evaluation of Efficiencies of Locally Available Neutralizing Agents for Passive Treatment of Acid Mine Drainage

• Published in: Minerals (Basel) Vol. 10; no. 10; p. 845
• Main Authors: Turingan, Casey Oliver A., Singson, Giulio B., Melchor, Bernadette T., Alorro, Richard D., Beltran, Arnel B., Orbecido, Aileen H.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 01.09.2020
• Subjects: Abandoned mines; Acid mine drainage; Adsorption; Aggregates; Alkalinity; Aluminium; Aluminum; Aluminum oxide; By products; Calcite; Calcium; Calcium oxide; Coal-fired power plants; Concrete; concrete aggregate; Concrete aggregates; Contamination; Fly ash; Goethite; Haematite; Heavy metals; Hematite; Iron; iron hydroxide; iron oxyhydroxide; Jar tests; Limestone; Magnetite; Manganese; Mine drainage; Minerals; Mining; Mining industry; Neutralization; Nickel; nickel ore; Oxidation; pH effects; Pollution; Removal; Sulfates; Sulphates; Total dissolved solids; Water pollution; Philippines
• ISSN: 2075-163X; 2075-163X
• DOI: 10.3390/min10100845

Acid mine drainage (AMD) generated from the mining industry elevates environmental concerns due to the pollution and contamination it causes to bodies of water. Over the years, passive treatment of AMD using alkalinity-generating materials have been widely studied with pH neutralization as its commonly observed mechanism. During the treatment process, heavy metal removal is also promoted by precipitation due to pH change or through adsorption facilitated by the mineral component of the materials. In this study, four materials were used and investigated: (1) a low grade ore (LGO) made up of goethite, calcium oxide, and manganese aluminum oxide (2–3) limestone and concrete aggregates (CA) composed of calcite, and (4) fly ash consisting of quartz, hematite, and magnetite. The performance of each alkalinity-generating agent at varying AMD/media ratios was based on the change in pH, total dissolved solids (TDS), oxidation reduction potential (EH); and heavy metals (Fe, Ni, and Al) removal and sulfate concentration reduction. Concrete aggregate displayed the most significant effect in treating AMD after raising the pH to 12.42 and removing 99% Fe, 99% Ni, 96% Al, and 57% sulfates. Afterwards, the efficiency of CA at various particle sizes were evaluated over 1 h. The smallest range at 2.00–3.35mm was observed to be most effective after 60 min, raising the pH to 6.78 and reducing 94% Fe, 78% Ni, and 92% Al, but only 28% sulfates. Larger particles of CA were able to remove higher amounts of sulfate up to 57%, similar to the jar test. Overall, CA is an effective treatment media for neutralization; however, its performance can be complemented by a second media for heavy metal and sulfate removal.