A Multicriteria Decision-Making Model for the Selection of Suitable Renewable Energy Sources

With the expansion of its industrial and manufacturing sectors, with the goal of positioning Vietnam as the world’s new production hub, Vietnam is forecast to face a surge in energy demand. Today, the main source of energy of Vietnam is fossil fuels, which are not environmentally friendly and are ra...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMathematics (Basel) Vol. 9; no. 12; p. 1318
Main Authors Wang, Chia-Nan, Kao, Jui-Chung, Wang, Yen-Hui, Nguyen, Van Thanh, Nguyen, Viet Tinh, Husain, Syed Tam
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Basel MDPI AG 01.06.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:With the expansion of its industrial and manufacturing sectors, with the goal of positioning Vietnam as the world’s new production hub, Vietnam is forecast to face a surge in energy demand. Today, the main source of energy of Vietnam is fossil fuels, which are not environmentally friendly and are rapidly depleting. The speed of extraction and consumption of fossil fuels is too fast, causing them to become increasingly scarce and gradually depleted. Renewable energy options, such as solar, wind, hydro electrical, and biomass, can be considered as sustainable alternatives to fossil fuels. However, to ensure the effectiveness of renewable energy development initiatives, technological, economic, and environmental must be taken in consideration when choosing a suitable renewable energy resource. In this research, the authors present a multi-criteria decision-making model (MCDM) implementing the grey analytic hierarchy process (G-AHP) method and the weighted aggregates sum product assessment (WASPAS) method for the selection of optimal renewable energy sources for the energy sector of Vietnam. The results of the proposed model have determined that solar energy is the optimal source of renewable energy with a performance score of 0.8822, followed by wind (0.8766), biomass (0.8488), and solid waste energy (0.8135) based on the calculations of the aforementioned methods.
ISSN:2227-7390
2227-7390
DOI:10.3390/math9121318