Effects of epibiotic algae on the survival, biomass and recruitment of mussels, Mytilus L. (Bivalvia: Mollusca)

• Published in: Journal of experimental marine biology and ecology Vol. 328; no. 2; pp. 265 - 276
• Main Authors: O'Connor, Nessa E., Crowe, Tasman P., McGrath, David
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 24.01.2006; Elsevier Science
• Subjects: Algae; Animal and plant ecology; Animal, plant and microbial ecology; Biological and medical sciences; Bivalvia; Direct; Epibiont; Fucales; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Indirect interaction; Invertebrates; Marine; Mollusca; Mussels; Mytilus; Sea water ecosystems; Synecology; ANE, Eire; Mussels; Indirect interaction; Algae; Epibiont; Mytilus; Direct; Interspecific association; Biomass; Survival; Recruitment; Marine environment; Aquatic environment; Bivalvia; Invertebrata; Mollusca; Thallophyta
• ISSN: 0022-0981; 1879-1697
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2005.07.013

Habitats composed of living ‘ecosystem engineers’, such as mussels, are subject to direct and indirect interactions with organisms that live among them. These interactions may affect the presence and structure of habitat, and hence, the associated taxa. We examined the direct effects of epibiotic algae on the survival, biomass and recruitment of mussels ( Mytilus L.) on the west coast of Ireland. A field experiment showed that the presence of epibiotic fucoid algae reduced the likelihood of survival of mussels during storms. We also found that the strength of attachment of mussels did not increase in the presence of epibionts. Another in situ experiment revealed that the presence of ephemeral epibiotic algal mats had no effect on the biomass of host mussels, suggesting no effect on mussel growth or production. The abundance of small mussels (< 5 mm) covaried with cover of epibiotic algae at one location, but experimental results suggest no direct effect of the algae on recruitment unless through the action of chemical cues which linger after the removal of algae. We have identified a negative direct interaction between epibiotic algae and mussels on exposed rocky shores, which may often be characterised by bottom-up regulation. It is thought that positive interactions may be more important on more sheltered or sedimentary shores where top-down processes are more likely to dominate.