Can a Paradigm Shift from Risk Management to Critical Reflection Improve Child-Inclusive Practice?

• Published in: Societies (Basel, Switzerland) Vol. 12; no. 1; p. 1
• Main Authors: Morley, Christine, Clarke, Joanne, Leggatt-Cook, Chez, Shkalla, Donna
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 01.02.2022
• Subjects: Accountability; Anglophones; Case studies; child protection; Child welfare; child-inclusive practice; Children; Children & youth; critical practice; critical reflection; Decision making; Ethnolinguistic groups; Neoliberalism; Participation; Performance management; Protective factors; Research projects; Risk assessment; Risk management; Social work; Social workers; Technology; Well being; Queensland Australia; Australia
• ISSN: 2075-4698; 2075-4698
• DOI: 10.3390/soc12010001

Child protection systems within Anglophone countries have been increasingly dominated by neoliberal managerial, risk-dominant paradigms over the past three decades. Assumed to deliver a cost-effective strategy to increase the safety of children, there are many ways this paradigmatic combination systematically undermines child welfare, participation, and well-being. This paper specifically focuses on the ways that risk assessment, neoliberal, and managerial discourses have infiltrated practice and operate to silence and exclude children’s voices. It draws on two case studies to showcase key findings of a comprehensive, state-wide research project called Empowering Children’s Voices, which was initiated by UnitingCare, a non-government organisation within Queensland, Australia, and conducted in partnership with researchers from Queensland University of Technology. It will be argued that a paradigm shift towards a critically reflective reinterpretation of risk can be far more effective at promoting child-inclusive practice and establishing children’s empowered voices as a protective factor against harm.