Leaf hydraulic safety margin and safety-efficiency trade-off across angiosperm woody species

Leaf hydraulic conductance and the vulnerability to water deficits have profound effects on plant distribution and mortality. In this study, we compiled a leaf hydraulic trait dataset with 311 species-at-site combinations from biomes worldwide. These traits included maximum leaf hydraulic conductanc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBiology letters (2005) Vol. 16; no. 11; p. 20200456
Main Authors Yan, Chao-Long, Ni, Ming-Yuan, Cao, Kun-Fang, Zhu, Shi-Dan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England The Royal Society 01.11.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Leaf hydraulic conductance and the vulnerability to water deficits have profound effects on plant distribution and mortality. In this study, we compiled a leaf hydraulic trait dataset with 311 species-at-site combinations from biomes worldwide. These traits included maximum leaf hydraulic conductance ( ), water potential at 50% loss of (P50 ), and minimum leaf water potential ( ). Leaf hydraulic safety margin (HSM ) was calculated as the difference between and P50 . Our results indicated that 70% of the studied species had a narrow HSM (less than 1 MPa), which was consistent with the global pattern of stem hydraulic safety margin. There was a positive relationship between HSM and aridity index (the ratio of mean annual precipitation to potential evapotranspiration), as species from humid sites tended to have larger HSM . We found a significant relationship between and P50 across global angiosperm woody species and within each of the different plant groups. This global analysis of leaf hydraulic traits improves our understanding of plant hydraulic response to environmental change.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Electronic supplementary material is available online at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5193654.
ISSN:1744-9561
1744-957X
DOI:10.1098/rsbl.2020.0456