Green LD (BOF) Steelmaking—Reduced CO2 Emissions via Increased Scrap Rate

The basic oxygen furnace (BOF) is the dominating primary steelmaking process. It is an autothermal process where hot metal and scrap are used as charging materials. The decarbonization and transformation of integrated BOF steelmaking will be the most important challenge in the coming years. Steel sc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMetals (Basel ) Vol. 12; no. 3; p. 466
Main Authors Voraberger, Bernhard, Wimmer, Gerald, Dieguez Salgado, Uxia, Wimmer, Erich, Pastucha, Krzysztof, Fleischanderl, Alexander
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Basel MDPI AG 01.03.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The basic oxygen furnace (BOF) is the dominating primary steelmaking process. It is an autothermal process where hot metal and scrap are used as charging materials. The decarbonization and transformation of integrated BOF steelmaking will be the most important challenge in the coming years. Steel scrap is a charge material without new CO2 emissions, whose availability is expected to grow significantly and will play a key role in this decarbonization process. Several solutions have been developed by Primetals Technologies to provide additional energy for processing higher scrap rates in integrated BOF steelmaking. Such solutions include simple upgrade packages installed on existing converters such as process models for heat optimization, post-combustion, and scrap preheating lances. For higher scrap rates from 30% to 50%, a combination blowing converter and JET converter is required to provide sufficient mixing during scrap melting and the highest heat transfer from the increased post-combustion. Hybrid EAF–BOF operation and limitations regarding scrap quality also need to be considered for the transformation of steelmaking. Scrap sorting and processing can be a solution to reduce residual levels in crude steel for high scrap rates. Based on reference plant data, the CO2 reduction potential of the presented solution versus the effort and complexity of implementation is compared.
ISSN:2075-4701
2075-4701
DOI:10.3390/met12030466