Qualitatively Unpacking Canadian Public Safety Personnel Experiences of Trauma and Their Well-Being

• Published in: Canadian journal of criminology and criminal justice Vol. 60; no. 4; pp. 566 - 577
• Main Authors: Ricciardelli, Rose, Carleton, R. Nicholas, Groll, Dianne, Cramm, Heidi
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Toronto University of Toronto Press 01.10.2018
• Subjects: Anger; Anxiety; Attitudes; Avoidance behavior; Back pain; Children; Crying; Cynicism; Dissolution; Divorce; Employers; Families & family life; Headaches; Injuries; Internet; Myocardial infarction; Occupational stress; Occupations; Personal health; Police; Polls & surveys; Psychological aspects; Psychological distress; Psychological trauma; Public safety; Rage; Social anxiety; Social exclusion; Symptoms; Trauma; Well being; Canada
• ISSN: 1707-7753; 1911-0219
• DOI: 10.3138/cjccj.2017-0053.r2

We thematically analysed responses volunteered by 828 of the nearly 9,000 public safety personnel (PSP) who participated in an online survey on occupational stress injuries and symptoms. Participants responded to an open-ended optional request for “additional feedback” located at the end of the survey. Salient response themes reveal that, across occupations and organizations, PSP report witnessing, enduring, and encountering extensive trauma, directly and vicariously, acutely and cumulatively. PSP reported effects of such trauma on themselves and their families as including physical (e.g., headaches, back pain, cardiac arrest, digestive symptoms), psychological (e.g., crying, feeling unhappy, living in fear, experiencing anxiety and anger), and social or interpersonal impacts (e.g., social exclusion, avoidance, cynicism towards others). The effects on their families included marital breakdown and relationship dissolution with children, as well as increased familial stress, strain, and anger. PSP also reported fatalistic attitudes; specifically, they felt that nothing would change, that they had no voice, and that both their employer and the different levels of government did not care about their well-being.