Initial Evidence That Letter Fluency Tasks Are Valid Indicators of Early Reading Skill

This longitudinal investigation evaluated the validity of letter-name fluency (LNF) and nonsense word fluency (NWF) measures as indicators of early reading skill with a sample of 39 kindergarten children. In the spring of kindergarten and first grade, these children responded to a battery of languag...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of special education Vol. 36; no. 4; pp. 223 - 233
Main Authors Speece, Deborah L., Mills, Christina, Ritchey, Kristen D., Hillman, Elgen
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Thousand Oaks, CA Sage Publications 2003
SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This longitudinal investigation evaluated the validity of letter-name fluency (LNF) and nonsense word fluency (NWF) measures as indicators of early reading skill with a sample of 39 kindergarten children. In the spring of kindergarten and first grade, these children responded to a battery of language, reading-related, and reading measures. Construct and social consequential validity were evaluated through concurrent and predictive criterion-related validity coefficients, multiple regression analyses, and classification analysis. Evidence supportive of validity was found for both fluency measures, with NWF receiving the strongest support. Both fluency measures were more sensitive to poor reader status in first grade than any other measure when reading was defined by oral reading fluency. These findings extend the usefulness of NWF to the early identification of kindergarten students.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-4669
1538-4764
DOI:10.1177/002246690303600403