Cybersecurity Risk Assessment: A Systematic Mapping Review, Proposal, and Validation

• Published in: Applied sciences Vol. 13; no. 1; p. 395
• Main Authors: Sánchez-García, Isaac Daniel, Mejía, Jezreel, San Feliu Gilabert, Tomás
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 01.01.2023
• Subjects: algorithms; Automation; Confidentiality; Cybersecurity; Identification; International organizations; ISO standards; Mapping; Risk assessment; Risk management; Security management; systematic mapping review
• ISSN: 2076-3417; 2076-3417
• DOI: 10.3390/app13010395

Incorporating technologies across all sectors has meant that cybersecurity risk assessment is now a critical step in cybersecurity risk management. However, risk assessment can be a complicated process for organizations. Therefore, many authors have attempted to automate this step using qualitative and quantitative tools. The problems with the tools and the risk assessment stage in general are (1) not considering all the sub-steps of risk assessment and (2) not identifying the variables necessary for an accurate risk calculation. To address these issues, this article presents a systematic mapping review (SMR) of tools that automate the cybersecurity risk assessment stage based on studies published in the last decade. As a result, we identify and describe 35 tools from 40 primary studies. Most of the primary studies were published between 2012 and 2020, indicating an upward trend of cyber risk assessment tool publication in recent years. The main objectives of this paper are to: (I) identify the differences (reference models and applications) and coverage of the main qualitative and quantitative models, (II) identify relevant risk assessment variables, (III) propose a risk assessment model (qualitative and quantitative) that considers the main variables and sub-stages of risk assessment stage, and (IV) obtain an assessment of the proposed model by experts in the field of cybersecurity. The proposal was sent to a group of 28 cybersecurity experts who approved the proposed variables and their relevance in the cybersecurity risk assessment stage, identifying a majority use of qualitative tools but a preference of experts for quantitative tools.