A review of the nature and origin of limestone microporosity

• Published in: Marine and petroleum geology Vol. 107; pp. 527 - 554
• Main Authors: Hashim, Mohammed S., Kaczmarek, Stephen E.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier Ltd 01.09.2019
• Subjects: Carbonate Diagensis; Lime Mud; Limestone; Micrite; Microporosity; Reservoir Characterization; Review; Stabilization; Microporosity; Reservoir Characterization; Stabilization; Lime Mud; Limestone; Micrite; Review; Carbonate Diagensis
• ISSN: 0264-8172; 1873-4073
• DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2019.03.037

Limestone microporosity is ubiquitous and extensively developed in most Phanerozoic limestones. From an economic perspective, microporosity is important because it contributes substantially to the carbonate pore system, which can host significant volumes of water and hydrocarbons. Therefore, determining the presence and distribution of limestone micropores is necessary for accurate hydrocarbon estimations, reservoir characterization, and fluid flow simulations. From an academic standpoint, microporosity is important because its genesis is intimately linked with the mineralogical stabilization of metastable sediments, a fundamental process in carbonate diagenesis. Many types of micropores contribute to what has been referred to as microporosity, but the vast majority is hosted among low-magnesium calcite (LMC) microcrystals that are present in limestone matrix and allochems. Geochemical, textural, and mineralogical data from natural settings and laboratory experiments indicate that LMC microcrystals are diagenetic in origin. More specifically, these data support a diagenetic model of mineralogical stabilization that involves dissolution of precursor sediments dominated by aragonite and high-magnesium calcite (HMC) minerals, and precipitation of LMC microcrystal cements. The stabilization process is inferred to take place in the meteoric, marine, and burial diagenetic realms. Although it has not been directly observed, carbon and oxygen isotopes, as well as trace element data suggest that LMC microcrystals form during burial diagenesis in marine-like fluids. Evidence suggests that porosity is not generated during this dissolution-precipitation process, but rather inherited from the precursor sediments. The final arrangement of the micropores in a limestone, however, depends on the precise diagenetic pathway. LMC microcrystals exhibit a range of microcrystalline textures that are classified on the basis of crystal morphology and size. The three main textural classes - granular (framework), fitted (mosaic), and clustered - have been recognized across a wide range of ages, depositional settings, burial depths, and precursor types, and are characterized by distinct petrophysical properties, such as porosity, permeability, and pore-throat size. Observations from modern sediments also support the hypothesis that LMC microcrystals develop from aragonite and HMC dominated lime mud. The origin of lime mud has been extensively studied but still highly debated. Of particular interest to the discussion of microporosity are proposed secular variations in the dominant mineralogy of carbonate sediments through the Phanerozoic. Microporous limestones comprised of LMC microcrystals are equally abundant during times of aragonite seas and calcite seas, which suggests that no special mineral precursor is required. Microporous textures are also observed in deep marine chalks where micropores are hosted between chalk constituents. Unlike shallow marine limestones, deep marine sediments start out as mostly LMC therefore mineralogical stabilization is not a significant process in chalk diagenesis. •Microporosity is a ubiquitous feature of Phanerozoic limestones.•Microporosity is an important contributor to the overall carbonate pore system.•Microporosity is most commonly hosted between diagenetic LMC microcrystals.•LMC microcrystals exhibit a range of textures with unique petrophysical properties.•The origin and evolution of LMC microcrystals remains debated..