Photocatalytic water splitting with noble‐metal free cocatalysts for a comprehensive study of two nonidentical photoreactors designs

Here, the authors (i) discuss the most prominent co‐catalyst for H2 generation structured in the form of Me‐TiO2/MCM‐41 (Me: Ag, Co, Cu, Ni) based on structural, electronic, textural, morphological and optical characterization techniques, such as XRD, wide and small angle, XPS, Fourier‐transform inf...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEnvironmental progress & sustainable energy Vol. 40; no. 3
Main Authors Vicentini, Jean César Marinozi, Manieri, Rafael, Subtil, Gimerson Weigert, Oliveira Tavares, Fernanda, Oliveira, Daiane Marques, Yassue‐Cordeiro, Patrícia Hissae, Enzweiler, Heveline, Gimenes, Marcelino Luiz, Alves, Maria do Carmo Martins, Morais, Jonder, Scaliante, Mara Heloisa Neves Olsen, Souza, Marcos
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken, USA John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.05.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Here, the authors (i) discuss the most prominent co‐catalyst for H2 generation structured in the form of Me‐TiO2/MCM‐41 (Me: Ag, Co, Cu, Ni) based on structural, electronic, textural, morphological and optical characterization techniques, such as XRD, wide and small angle, XPS, Fourier‐transform infrared spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, B.E.T., textural analysis, photoacoustic spectroscopy and photoluminescence spectroscopy; and (ii) evaluate the difference in hydrogen production in two distinct geometric reactors based on a theoretical study of light distribution inside the reactors supported by the experimental quantum yield calculation. As a result, copper‐doped photocatalyst generated higher hydrogen amount compared to the others. The high photocatalyst performance was due to the greater lamp spectrum absorption, marked by the low bandgap value, and high photoactivity justified by the low rate of electronic recombination. The hydrogen generation in the quartz reactor was seven times higher than the annular one, and when at maximum light power, it is comparable to the most sophisticated reaction systems found in literature. The larger light exposure area per unit volume of the quartz reactor compared to the annular one is the reason why it obtained better results due to the lower emitted photon blockade, with a 1.81% apparent quantum yield.
Bibliography:Funding information
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
ISSN:1944-7442
1944-7450
DOI:10.1002/ep.13557