Comparison of shoot induction ability of different explants in herbaceous peony ( Paeonia lactiflora Pall.)

Shoot induction ability of explants of herbaceous peony was investigated in semisolid MS medium containing BA, TDZ and GA 3. Callus was readily induced from stem without node and petiole explants within 2 days of culture but failed to generate shoots. Adventitious shoots were successfully produced f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inScientia horticulturae Vol. 123; no. 3; pp. 385 - 389
Main Authors Tian, Daike, Tilt, Ken M., Dane, Fenny, Woods, Floyd M., Sibley, Jeff L.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 2010
[Amsterdam; New York, NY]: Elsevier Science
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Shoot induction ability of explants of herbaceous peony was investigated in semisolid MS medium containing BA, TDZ and GA 3. Callus was readily induced from stem without node and petiole explants within 2 days of culture but failed to generate shoots. Adventitious shoots were successfully produced from meristematic regions only: bud eyes on nodal stem sections, and junctions of petioles and petiolules. No shoots were induced from internode sections, petiole without junctions, or leaf sections. Nodal sections were the most efficient explants. There were up to 20 shoots in one explant generated within 20 days of culture. TDZ was more effective than BA to induce shoots. The 100% shoot induction rate was obtained in medium containing 0.1–3 mg L −1 of TDZ. However, higher concentrations of TDZ inhibited shoot elongation and only large leaf clusters were produced. Combinations of BA and TDZ failed to increase shoot induction rates but caused shoots shorter. The 2–60-min pretreatment of explants with 20 mg L −1 TDZ solution was very effective to induce adventitious shoots directly, but both shoot number and shoot length tended to decrease as treatment time increased. GA 3 was beneficial for shoot and stem elongation.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2009.10.007
ISSN:0304-4238
1879-1018
DOI:10.1016/j.scienta.2009.10.007