C-Agree is local subject-verb agreement in Kipsigis

Upwards-oriented complementizer agreement raises questions about the directionality and locality of agreement. Based on novel data from original fieldwork, we argue that what has been described as an agreeing ‘say’-based complementizer in Kipsigis (Diercks and Rao 2019 ; Diercks et al. 2020 ) is the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNatural language and linguistic theory Vol. 43; no. 1; pp. 223 - 272
Main Authors Driemel, Imke, Kouneli, Maria
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Dordrecht Springer Netherlands 01.02.2025
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Upwards-oriented complementizer agreement raises questions about the directionality and locality of agreement. Based on novel data from original fieldwork, we argue that what has been described as an agreeing ‘say’-based complementizer in Kipsigis (Diercks and Rao 2019 ; Diercks et al. 2020 ) is the lexical verb ‘say,’ and what looks like C-Agree is in fact agreement between this verb and its locally introduced (often covert) subject. Our analysis highlights that ‘say’-based complementizers might be of category V, not C, in more languages than previously thought (Koopman 1984 ; Major 2021 ), which means that some instances of what has been described as C-Agree may instantiate standard verbal agreement. Furthermore, we provide a semantic analysis of ‘say’-based complementation in Kipsigis along the lines of contentful eventualities (Hacquard 2006 ; Kratzer 2013a ).
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0167-806X
1573-0859
DOI:10.1007/s11049-024-09622-8