Maxillary Distraction Osteogenesis in the Adolescent Cleft Patient: Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Analysis of Linear and Volumetric Changes over Five Years

Objective To assess the results of maxillary distraction osteogenesis with the Rigid External Distraction System using three-dimensional computed tomography scan volume-rendered images with respect to stability and facial growth at three time frames: preoperative (T0), 1-year postoperative (T1), and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Cleft palate-craniofacial journal Vol. 48; no. 4; pp. 445 - 454
Main Authors Kuo-Ting Chen, Philip, Por, Yong-Chen, Jein-Wein Liou, Eric, Chun-Shin Chang, Frank
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.07.2011
American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association
SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective To assess the results of maxillary distraction osteogenesis with the Rigid External Distraction System using three-dimensional computed tomography scan volume-rendered images with respect to stability and facial growth at three time frames: preoperative (T0), 1-year postoperative (T1), and 5-years postoperative (T2). Design Retrospective analysis. Setting Tertiary. Patients A total of 12 patients with severe cleft maxillary hypoplasia were treated between June 30, 1997, and July 15, 1998. The mean age at surgery was 11 years 1 month. Interventions Le Fort I maxillary distraction osteogenesis. Distraction was started 2 to 5 days postsurgery at a rate of 1 mm per day. The consolidation period was 3 months. No face mask was used. A paired t test was used for statistical analysis. Main Outcome Measures Overjet, ANB, and SNA and maxillary, pterygoid, and mandibular volumes. Results From T0 to T1, there were statistically significant increments of overjet, ANB, and SNA and maxillary, pterygoid, and mandibular volumes. The T1 to T2 period demonstrated a reduction of overjet (30.07%) and ANB (54.42%). The maxilla showed a stable SNA and a small but statistically significant advancement of the ANS point. There was a significant increase in the mandibular volume. However, there was no significant change in the maxillary and pterygoid volumes. Conclusions Maxillary distraction osteogenesis demonstrated linear and volumetric maxillary growth during the distraction phase without clinically significant continued growth thereafter. Overcorrection is required to take into account recurrence of midface retrusion over the long term.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1055-6656
1545-1569
DOI:10.1597/09-087