“Please understand we cannot provide further information”: evaluating content and transparency of GDPR-mandated AI disclosures

• Published in: AI & society Vol. 39; no. 1; pp. 235 - 256
• Main Authors: Wulf, Alexander J., Seizov, Ognyan
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Springer London 01.02.2024; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Algorithms; Artificial Intelligence; Automation; Big Data; Computer Science; Content analysis; Control; Data processing; Effectiveness; Engineering Economics; General Data Protection Regulation; Information processing; Logistics; Marketing; Mechatronics; Methodology of the Social Sciences; Organization; Original Paper; Performing Arts; Robotics; Automated data processing; Information disclosures; Explainable AI; Artificial intelligence; Empirical legal studies; GDPR
• ISSN: 0951-5666; 1435-5655
• DOI: 10.1007/s00146-022-01424-z

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) of the EU confirms the protection of personal data as a fundamental human right and affords data subjects more control over the way their personal information is processed, shared, and analyzed. However, where data are processed by artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms, asserting control and providing adequate explanations is a challenge. Due to massive increases in computing power and big data processing, modern AI algorithms are too complex and opaque to be understood by most data subjects. Articles 15 and 22 of the GDPR provide a modest regulatory framework for automated data processing by, among other things, mandating that data controllers inform data subjects about when it is being used, and its logic and ramifications. Nevertheless, due to the phrasing of the articles and the numerous exceptions they allow, doubts have arisen about their effectiveness. In this paper, we empirically evaluate the quality and effectiveness of AI disclosures as mandated by the GDPR. By means of an online survey ( N  = 835), we investigated how data subjects expect to be informed about the automated processing of their data. We then conducted a content analysis of the AI disclosures of N  = 100 companies and organizations. The combined findings reveal that current GDPR-mandated disclosures do not meet the expectations and needs of data subjects. Explanations drawn up following the guidelines of the generic formulations of the GDPR differ widely and are often vague, incomplete and lack transparency. In our conclusions we identify a path towards standardizing and optimizing AI information notices.