Structures and spin states of mono- and dinuclear iron(II) complexes of imidazole-4-carbaldehyde azine and its derivatives

Mononuclear [Fe(H 2L R) 2]X 2 (R = H, 2-Me, 5-Me, 2-Et-5-Me; X = ClO 4, BF 4) and dinuclear [Fe 2(H 2L R) 3]X 4 complexes containing imidazole-4-carbaldehyde azine (H 2L H) and its derivatives prepared by condensation of 4-formylimidazole, 2-methyl- or 5-methyl-4-formylimidazole, or 2-ethyl-4-methyl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCoordination chemistry reviews Vol. 254; no. 15; pp. 1871 - 1881
Main Authors Sunatsuki, Yukinari, Kawamoto, Ryohei, Fujita, Kunihiro, Maruyama, Hisashi, Suzuki, Takayoshi, Ishida, Hiroyuki, Kojima, Masaaki, Iijima, Seiichiro, Matsumoto, Naohide
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 01.08.2010
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Mononuclear [Fe(H 2L R) 2]X 2 (R = H, 2-Me, 5-Me, 2-Et-5-Me; X = ClO 4, BF 4) and dinuclear [Fe 2(H 2L R) 3]X 4 complexes containing imidazole-4-carbaldehyde azine (H 2L H) and its derivatives prepared by condensation of 4-formylimidazole, 2-methyl- or 5-methyl-4-formylimidazole, or 2-ethyl-4-methyl-5-formylimidazole, with hydrazine in a 2:1 mole ratio in methanol, were prepared and their magnetostructural relationships were studied. In the mononuclear complexes, H 2L R acts as an unsymmetrical tridentate ligand with two imidazole nitrogen atoms and one azine nitrogen atom, while in the dinuclear complexes, H 2L R acts as a dinucleating ligand employing four nitrogen atoms to form a triple helicate structure. At room temperature, [Fe 2(H 2L H) 3](ClO 4) 4 and [Fe 2(H 2L 2-Me) 3](ClO 4) 4 were in the high-spin (HS) and low-spin (LS) states, respectively. The results are in accordance with the ligand field strength of H 2L 2-Me with electron-donating methyl groups being stronger than H 2L H, with the order of the ligand field strengths being H 2L 2-Me > H 2L H. However, in the mononuclear [Fe(H 2L H) 2](ClO 4) 2 and [Fe(H 2L 2-Me) 2](ClO 4) 2 complexes, a different order of ligand field strengths, H 2L H > H 2L 2-Me, was observed because [Fe(H 2L H) 2](ClO 4) 2 was in the LS state while [Fe(H 2L 2-Me) 2](ClO 4) 2 was in the HS state at room temperature. X-ray structural studies revealed that the interligand steric repulsion between a methyl group of an H 2L 2-Me ligand and the other ligand in [Fe(H 2L 2-Me) 2](ClO 4) 2 is responsible for the observed change in the spin state. The same is true for [Fe(H 2L 2-Et-5-Me) 2](ClO 4) 2, while [Fe(H 2L 5-Me) 2](ClO 4) 2 does not involve such a steric congestion and stays in the LS state over the temperature range 5–300 K. Two kinds of crystals (polymorphs) were isolated for [Fe 2(H 2L H) 3](BF 4) 4 and [Fe 2(H 2L 2-Et-5-Me) 3](ClO 4) 4, and they exhibited different magnetic behaviors.
ISSN:0010-8545
1873-3840
DOI:10.1016/j.ccr.2009.11.016