Specialty Practice and Cost Considerations in the Management of Uveitis Associated With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

• Published in: Journal of pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus Vol. 53; no. 4; pp. 246 - 251
• Main Authors: Palestine, Alan G, Singh, Jasleen K, Kolfenbach, Jason R, Ozzello, Daniel J
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States SLACK INCORPORATED 01.07.2016
• Subjects: Arthritis; Arthritis, Juvenile - drug therapy; Child; Costs; Decision Making; Drug Costs; Female; Glucocorticoids - therapeutic use; Health Care Costs; Health Care Surveys; Health insurance; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use; Insurance, Health; Methotrexate - therapeutic use; Ophthalmology; Patient Care Team; Pediatrics; Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics & numerical data; Rheumatology; Specialization; Surveys and Questionnaires; Uveitis - drug therapy
• ISSN: 0191-3913; 1938-2405
• DOI: 10.3928/01913913-20160505-01

To evaluate whether cost, prior insurance authorization concerns, and subspecialty practice influence therapeutic decisions in the treatment of uveitis associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. A total of 2,965 pediatric ophthalmologists, uveitis specialists, retina specialists, and rheumatologists across the United States were surveyed via e-mail regarding their choice in long-term therapy for a hypothetical patient with uveitis associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Outcomes of interest were differences in therapy choice based on cost/prior authorization and specialty practice. There were significant differences in the use of methotrexate and biologics among specialists, both with and without consideration for cost and prior authorization. Physicians in four different specialties who treat uveitis associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis agree on methotrexate as a first-line treatment choice and a biologic immunosuppressive medication as a second choice, but there are significant differences between the specialties in their use of these medications. Cost and insurance considerations did not affect therapy selection. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2016;53(4):246-251.].