Cloud-Assisted Data Fusion and Sensor Selection for Internet of Things

The Internet of Things (IoT) is connecting people and smart devices on a scale that was once unimaginable. One major challenge for the IoT is to handle vast amount of sensing data generated from the smart devices that are resource-limited and subject to missing data due to link or node failures. By...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIEEE internet of things journal Vol. 3; no. 3; pp. 257 - 268
Main Authors Bijarbooneh, Farshid Hassani, Du, Wei, Ngai, Edith C.-H, Xiaoming Fu, Jiangchuan Liu
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Piscataway IEEE 01.06.2016
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The Internet of Things (IoT) is connecting people and smart devices on a scale that was once unimaginable. One major challenge for the IoT is to handle vast amount of sensing data generated from the smart devices that are resource-limited and subject to missing data due to link or node failures. By exploring cloud computing with the IoT, we present a cloud-based solution that takes into account the link quality and spatio-temporal correlation of data to minimize energy consumption by selecting sensors for sampling and relaying data. We propose a multiphase adaptive sensing algorithm with belief propagation (BP) protocol (ASBP), which can provide high data quality and reduce energy consumption by turning on only a small number of nodes in the network. We formulate the sensor selection problem and solve it using both constraint programming (CP) and greedy search. We then use our message passing algorithm (BP) for performing inference to reconstruct the missing sensing data. ASBP is evaluated based on the data collected from real sensors. The results show that while maintaining a satisfactory level of data quality and prediction accuracy, ASBP can provide load balancing among sensors successfully and preserves 80% more energy compared with the case where all sensor nodes are actively involved.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:2327-4662
2327-4662
DOI:10.1109/JIOT.2015.2502182