Effects of low temperatures on sexual reproduction of ‘Tainong 1’ mango ( Mangifera indica)
▶ Low temperatures significantly affected pistil and male gametophyte development. ▶ Pollen tube growth was retarded under low temperature stress. ▶ Slow growth rate of pollen tube seriously impacted fertilization success. Prevailing ambient temperature during the reproductive phase is one of import...
Saved in:
Published in | Scientia horticulturae Vol. 126; no. 2; pp. 109 - 119 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Amsterdam
Elsevier B.V
01.09.2010
[Amsterdam; New York, NY]: Elsevier Science Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | ▶ Low temperatures significantly affected pistil and male gametophyte development. ▶ Pollen tube growth was retarded under low temperature stress. ▶ Slow growth rate of pollen tube seriously impacted fertilization success.
Prevailing ambient temperature during the reproductive phase is one of important factors for seed and fruit set in different plant species. In mango (
Mangifera indica L.), natural low temperatures during flowering induced seedless fruits. Here the sexual reproduction process of ‘Tainong 1’ mango at low temperatures (diurnal maximum temperature
<
20
°C) was studied. For comparison, we also examined this process at “normal” temperatures (diurnal maximum ranging from 25 to 30
°C, diurnal average temperature
>
20
°C). Results showed: natural low temperatures significantly affected pistil and male gametophyte development, resulting in pollen grains with low viability. Meiotic chromosomal irregularities, including univalents, multivalents, laggards, bridges and micronuclei were detected at higher incidences and significantly greater proportions of nucleolus fragmentation and dissolution were detected when temperatures were low. Pollen tube growth was retarded under low temperature stress, either
in vivo or
in vitro. The virtual absence of sexual reproduction of ‘Tainong 1’ mango at low temperatures appears to be due largely to slow growth of pollen tube
in vivo and to a low rate of successful fertilization. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2010.06.017 |
ISSN: | 0304-4238 1879-1018 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.scienta.2010.06.017 |