Painlevé–Gullstrand coordinates versus Kerr spacetime geometry
We discuss the tension between the possible existence of Painlevé–Gullstrand coordinate systems versus the explicit geometrical features of the Kerr spacetime; a subject of interest to Professor Thanu Padmanabhan in the weeks immediately preceding his unexpected death. We shall carefully distinguish...
Saved in:
Published in | General relativity and gravitation Vol. 54; no. 11 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York
Springer US
01.11.2022
Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0001-7701 1572-9532 |
DOI | 10.1007/s10714-022-03025-z |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | We discuss the tension between the possible existence of Painlevé–Gullstrand coordinate systems
versus
the explicit geometrical features of the Kerr spacetime; a subject of interest to Professor Thanu Padmanabhan in the weeks immediately preceding his unexpected death. We shall carefully distinguish
strong
and
weak
Painlevé–Gullstrand coordinate systems, and
conformal
variants thereof, cataloguing what we know can and cannot be done—sometimes we can make
explicit global
statements, sometimes we must resort to
implicit local
statements. For the Kerr spacetime the best that seems to be achievable is to set the lapse function to unity and represent the spatial slices with a 3-metric in factorized
unimodular
form; this arises from considering the Doran version of Kerr spacetime in Cartesian coordinates. We finish by exploring the (limited) extent to which this construction might possibly lead to implementing an “analogue spacetime” model suitable for laboratory simulations of the Kerr spacetime. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
ISSN: | 0001-7701 1572-9532 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10714-022-03025-z |