Transgenic expression of mutant peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor γ in liver precipitates fasting–induced steatosis but protects against high-fat diet–induced steatosis in mice
Steatosis is one of the most common liver diseases and is associated with the metabolic syndrome. A line of evidence suggests that peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor (PPAR) α and PPAR γ are involved in its pathogenesis. Hepatic overexpression of PPAR γ1 in mice provokes steatosis, whereas li...
Saved in:
Published in | Metabolism, clinical and experimental Vol. 54; no. 11; pp. 1490 - 1498 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Elsevier Inc
01.11.2005
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Steatosis is one of the most common liver diseases and is associated with the metabolic syndrome. A line of evidence suggests that peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor (PPAR)
α and PPAR
γ are involved in its pathogenesis. Hepatic overexpression of PPAR
γ1 in mice provokes steatosis, whereas liver-specific PPAR
γ disruption ameliorates steatosis in
ob/ob mice, suggesting that hepatic PPAR
γ functions as an aggravator of steatosis. In contrast, PPAR
α-null mice are susceptible to steatosis because of reduced hepatic fatty acid oxidation. PPAR
γ with mutations in its C-terminal ligand-binding domain (L468A/E471A mutant PPAR
γ1) have been reported as a constitutive repressor of both PPAR
α and PPAR
γ activities in vitro. To elucidate the effect of cosuppression of PPAR
α and PPAR
γ on steatosis, we generated mutant PPAR
γ transgenic mice (Liver mt PPAR
γ Tg) under the control of liver-specific human serum amyloid P component promoter. In the liver of transgenic mice, PPAR
α and PPAR
γ agonist–induced augmentation of the expression of downstream target genes of PPAR
α and PPAR
γ, respectively, was significantly attenuated, suggesting PPAR
α and PPAR
γ cosuppression in vivo. Suppression of PPAR
α and PPAR
γ target genes was also observed in the fasted and high-fat–fed conditions. Liver mt PPAR
γ Tg were susceptible to fasting-induced steatosis while being protected against high-fat diet–induced steatosis. The opposite hepatic outcomes in Liver mt PPAR
γ Tg as a result of fasting and high-fat feeding may indicate distinct roles of PPAR
α and PPAR
γ in 2 different types of nutritionally provoked steatosis. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0026-0495 1532-8600 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.metabol.2005.05.015 |