Balancing evidence-based care with patient-centered individualized care

Weak evidence, when manifested in clinical guidelines, can translate into biased vascular care. In vascular surgery, we have few randomized controlled trials with appropriate representation of females and persons of color, so generalizability of trial results can be problematic. Physicians are requi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders (New York, NY) Vol. 11; no. 6; pp. 1089 - 1094
Main Authors Freeman, Nikki L.B., Browder, Sydney E., McGinigle, Katharine L.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.11.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Weak evidence, when manifested in clinical guidelines, can translate into biased vascular care. In vascular surgery, we have few randomized controlled trials with appropriate representation of females and persons of color, so generalizability of trial results can be problematic. Physicians are required to balance evidenced-based care (which is only as good as the underlying evidence) with personalized treatment recommendations that are often based on demographics, social circumstances, and/or existing therapeutic relationships. Biases, whether implicit or explicit, have an oversized effect on treatment decisions, and patient outcomes. In this commentary, we propose three principles to strengthen the vascular surgery evidence foundation and patient-centered decision-making going forward: (1) generating evidence designed for individualized care, (2) constructing clinical guidelines that are context specific and complexity aware, and (3) strengthening the training and support for surgeons to deliver patient-centered individualized care.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Conception and design: NF, SB, KM
Data collection: Not applicable
Obtained funding: Not applicable
Writing the article: NF, SB, KM
Final approval of the article: NF, SB, KM
Analysis and interpretation: Not applicable
Statistical analysis: Not applicable
Critical revision of the article: NF, SB, KM
Overall responsibility: KM
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
ISSN:2213-333X
2213-3348
DOI:10.1016/j.jvsv.2023.08.005