Balancing evidence-based care with patient-centered individualized care
Weak evidence, when manifested in clinical guidelines, can translate into biased vascular care. In vascular surgery, we have few randomized controlled trials with appropriate representation of females and persons of color, so generalizability of trial results can be problematic. Physicians are requi...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders (New York, NY) Vol. 11; no. 6; pp. 1089 - 1094 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Elsevier Inc
01.11.2023
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Weak evidence, when manifested in clinical guidelines, can translate into biased vascular care. In vascular surgery, we have few randomized controlled trials with appropriate representation of females and persons of color, so generalizability of trial results can be problematic. Physicians are required to balance evidenced-based care (which is only as good as the underlying evidence) with personalized treatment recommendations that are often based on demographics, social circumstances, and/or existing therapeutic relationships. Biases, whether implicit or explicit, have an oversized effect on treatment decisions, and patient outcomes. In this commentary, we propose three principles to strengthen the vascular surgery evidence foundation and patient-centered decision-making going forward: (1) generating evidence designed for individualized care, (2) constructing clinical guidelines that are context specific and complexity aware, and (3) strengthening the training and support for surgeons to deliver patient-centered individualized care. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Conception and design: NF, SB, KM Data collection: Not applicable Obtained funding: Not applicable Writing the article: NF, SB, KM Final approval of the article: NF, SB, KM Analysis and interpretation: Not applicable Statistical analysis: Not applicable Critical revision of the article: NF, SB, KM Overall responsibility: KM AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS |
ISSN: | 2213-333X 2213-3348 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jvsv.2023.08.005 |