Prospects and challenges of mini‐LED, OLED, and micro‐LED displays

Recently, “liquid crystal display (LCD), organic light‐emitting diode (OLED), or micro‐light‐emitting diode (LED): who wins?” is a heated debatable question. In this review article, we provide a comprehensive overview of these three promising display technologies through nine display performance ind...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the Society for Information Display Vol. 29; no. 6; pp. 446 - 465
Main Authors Hsiang, En‐Lin, Yang, Zhiyong, Yang, Qian, Lan, Yi‐Fen, Wu, Shin‐Tson
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Campbell Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.06.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Recently, “liquid crystal display (LCD), organic light‐emitting diode (OLED), or micro‐light‐emitting diode (LED): who wins?” is a heated debatable question. In this review article, we provide a comprehensive overview of these three promising display technologies through nine display performance indicators, including ambient contrast ratio, motion picture response time, viewing angle and angular color shift, color gamut, resolution density, power consumption, cost, lifetime, and thin profile and panel flexibility. The advantages and disadvantages of each technology are analyzed, and their future perspectives are discussed. In this review article, we give a comprehensive overview of three promising display technologies (liquid crystal displays [LCDs] with mini‐light‐emitting diode (LED) backlight, organic LED [OLED] displays, and micro‐LED [μLED] displays) through nine display performance metrics, including ambient contrast ratio, motion picture response time, viewing angle and angular color shift, color gamut, power consumption, resolution density, cost, lifetime, and thin profile and panel flexibility. The strengths and weaknesses of each technology are analyzed, and their future perspectives are discussed.
Bibliography:Funding information
En‐Lin Hsiang and Zhiyong Yang contributed equally to this work.
a.u.Vista, Inc., Grant/Award Number: 65018A64
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1071-0922
1938-3657
DOI:10.1002/jsid.1058