Risk factors for renal scarring and clinical morbidity in children with high-grade and low-grade primary vesicoureteral reflux

• Published in: Journal of pediatric urology Vol. 18; no. 2; pp. 225.e1 - 225.e8
• Main Authors: Mathias, Sitarah, Greenbaum, Larry A., Shubha, A.M., Raj, John A. Michael, Das, Kanishka, Pais, Priya
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Elsevier Ltd 01.04.2022
• Subjects: High-grade VUR; Primary vesicoureteral reflux; Renal scarring; UTI; eGFR; VUR; HDN; Primary vesicoureteral reflux; High-grade VUR; DMSA; DRF; UTI; BP; Renal scarring
• ISSN: 1477-5131; 1873-4898
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.12.017

Primary vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is associated with urinary tract infections (UTIs) and renal damage. However, the importance of early diagnosis of VUR has been questioned. Moreover, most studies have few patients with high-grade VUR. Hence, we retrospectively analyzed a large cohort of patients with primary high-grade and low-grade VUR and assessed risk factors for renal damage and clinical morbidity. We included patients (<18 years) at diagnosis with low-grade (1–3) or high-grade (4–5) primary VUR and noted their clinical history and presence of hypertension, low eGFR (<60ml/in/1.73 m2), renal scarring (focal or generalised) and reduced differential renal function (DRF; <45%). Risk factors were assessed (in patients and renal units) by logistic regression and generalised estimating equation. Of 399 primary VUR patients, 255 (64%) had high-grade VUR. Indications for voiding cystourethrogram were recurrent UTI (38%), first UTI (28%) and antenatal hydronephrosis (17%). At diagnosis, 252 (65%) had renal scars (focal in 170 [44%], generalised in 82 [21%]), and 188 (47%) had reduced DRF. High-grade VUR patients were more likely than low-grade VUR patients to have renal scarring (75% vs. 49%, p < 0.01), low eGFR (23% vs. 13%, p = 0.04) and significant hypertension (26% vs. 13%, p = 0.02). High-grade VUR was associated with generalised scars (odds ratio [OR] 11, p < 0.001), focal scars (OR 3.1, p < 0.001) and reduced DRF (OR 2.3, p < 0.001) shown in the table. Male sex was a risk factor for generalised scars (OR 2.3, p = 0.005). Focal scars were associated with recurrent UTIs (OR = 1.8, p = 0.004) and reduced DRF (OR 1.4, p = 0.027). Patients with multiple focal scars were diagnosed at an older age (2 years [1,4] than those with single scars (1.5 years [1,4] or no scars (1 year [0, 3]), p = 0.04). The prevalence of renal damage and clinical morbidity at VUR diagnosis was higher than other studies. High-grade VUR patients had a greater prevalence of renal damage, low eGFR and hypertension than low-grade VUR patients and was a risk factor for focal scars, generalised scars and reduced DRF. Focal scars were independently associated with recurrent UTI. Those with multiple scars were diagnosed later than those with single scars or no scars. High-grade VUR was associated with renal damage and clinical morbidity. Our study highlights the importance of diagnosing VUR early to identify patients who may warrant long-term follow-up and intervention to minimize morbidity.Summary TableFactors associated with renal parenchymal damage in primary VURa.Summary TableFactorsPatientRenal unitAdjusted Odds Ratiop valueAdjusted Odds Ratiop valueGeneralised scarsMale2.440.0042.290.005High-grade VURb5.78<0.00111.00<0.001Focal scarsHigh-grade VURb––3.10<0.001Recurrent UTI1.880.0041.520.020Symptomatic Antenatal HDN0.710.280.490.004Reduced DRFHigh-grade VURb2.120.0022.32<0.001Ipsilateral scars––1.440.027HDN hydronephrosis, UTI urinary tract infection, VUR vesicoureteral reflux.aConcise version of Table 2 in main manuscript.bGrade 4,5 VUR.