Non-denitrifying polyphosphate accumulating organisms obviate requirement for anaerobic condition

• Published in: Water research (Oxford) Vol. 111; pp. 393 - 403
• Main Authors: Cokro, A. Anisa, Law, Yingyu, Williams, Rohan B.H., Cao, Yeshi, Nielsen, Per H., Wuertz, Stefan
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Elsevier Ltd 15.03.2017
• Subjects: Accumulibacter; Acetate; Bioreactors - microbiology; Denitrification; EBPR; Non-DPAOs; Phosphorus; Polyphosphates; Propionate; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S; Sewage - microbiology; Accumulibacter; Propionate; Phosphorus; Acetate; Non-DPAOs; EBPR
• ISSN: 0043-1354; 1879-2448
• DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.01.006

Enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) is a widely used process in wastewater treatment that requires anaerobic/aerobic or anaerobic/anoxic cycling. Surprisingly, phosphorus (P) release was observed in the presence of nitrate in the anoxic compartment of the activated sludge tank in a full-scale treatment plant with the Modified Ludzack Ettinger configuration. We therefore studied the potential of this full-scale activated sludge community to perform EBPR under anoxic/aerobic cycling. The polyphosphate accumulating organism (PAO) Candidatus Accumulibacter represented 3.3% of total bacteria based on 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, and metagenome analysis suggested it was likely to be dominated by Clade IIC. Using acetate as the carbon source in batch experiments, active denitrifying organisms (DPAOs) were estimated to comprise 39–44% of the total PAO population in the sludge, with the remaining 56–61% unable to utilize nitrate. When propionate was provided as the organic carbon source, 95% of the PAO population was unable to denitrify. EBPR occurred under defined anoxic/aerobic conditions, despite the presence of DPAOs, when synthetic wastewater was supplemented with either acetate or propionate or when primary effluent was supplied. In addition, the P release and subsequent uptake rates under anoxic/aerobic conditions were comparable to those observed under anaerobic/aerobic conditions. In contrast, a significant reduction in P release rate was observed when acetate was provided under oxic conditions. We postulate that non-DPAOs that recognize the anoxic condition as pseudo-anaerobic were the key players in anoxic/aerobic EBPR. [Display omitted] •The EBPR capacity of sludge from a full-scale MLE system was investigated.•53–73% of the total PAO population in the sludge was unable to reduce nitrate.•Accumulibacter Clade IIC was the predominant PAO in the sludge.•Comparable EBPR rates achieved under anoxic/aerobic and anaerobic/aerobic cycling.•PAOs unable to reduce nitrate recognize anoxic condition as pseudo anaerobic.