Enhanced estrogen removal in activated sludge processes through the optimization of the hydraulic flow pattern

• Published in: Water research (Oxford) Vol. 164; p. 114905
• Main Authors: Coello-Garcia, T., Curtis, T.P., Mrozik, W., Davenport, R.J.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Elsevier Ltd 01.11.2019
• Subjects: Activated sludge; Continuously stirred-tank reactor (CSTR); Estrogens; Hydraulic flow optimization; Plug-flow; Continuously stirred-tank reactor (CSTR); Activated sludge; Hydraulic flow optimization; Plug-flow; Estrogens
• ISSN: 0043-1354; 1879-2448
• DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.114905

The removal of β-estradiol (E2) and α-ethinylestradiol (EE2) in biological wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) would need to be improved in order to comply with prospective Environmental Quality Standards (EQS) of 0.4 and 0.035 ng.L−1 respectively. The effluent concentration of a micropollutant in an activated sludge process is a function of the removal rate, the hydraulic retention time (HRT) and the flow pattern, which is usually overlooked. In order to better understand this aspect, we carried out tracer studies in eight WWTPs in the UK and found that relatively modest changes in aeration tanks would translate into tangible improvements in their flow pattern. We further evaluated the degradation rates for E1 (estrone), E2, E3 (estriol) and EE2 in each WWTP and we estimated that the modification of the flow pattern would be sufficient to place effluent concentrations of E2 (23.2 L∙gVSS−1∙d−1<kbio<210 L∙gVSS−1∙d−1) far below the prospective EQS, while EE2 (0.3 L∙gVSS−1∙d−1<kbio<2.9 L∙gVSS−1∙d−1) would have to rely on river dilution for compliance. Regarding E1 and E3, with no prospective legislation, the modifications would place E3 (9.9 L∙gVSS−1∙d−1<kbio<39.5 L∙gVSS−1∙d−1) effluent concentrations easily below its predicted no-effect concentrations (PNEC = 60 ng.L−1) while for E1, (2.6 L∙gVSS−1∙d−1<kbio<19.2 L∙gVSS−1∙d−1) it would very much depend on the degradation rates of the specific WWTP (PNEC = 6 ng.L−1). Improvement in flow pattern had the additional benefit of improving the effectiveness of other plausible changes in HRT or biological removal rates. Managing the flow pattern of existing WWTPs is a cost-efficient tool for managing the fate of estrogens. [Display omitted] •Most activated sludge reactors behaved like a CSTR despite their geometries.•Small hydraulic changes in an activated sludge reactor made it more plug-flow like.•Estimated effluent concentrations of E1, E2 and E3 were substantially reduced by such changes.•Estimated effluent concentrations of EE2 were not significantly reduced by such changes.