Computer-Based Assessment of Word Knowledge in Teens With Learning Disabilities

Computer-based and standard administrations of the Test of Word Knowledge (TOWK)-Level 2 core subtests (Word Definitions, Synonyms, Figurative Usage, Multiple Contexts) (Wiig & Secord, 1992) were compared for 30 subjects with learning disabilities. Half completed the computer-based version first...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inLanguage, speech & hearing services in schools Vol. 27; no. 1; pp. 21 - 28
Main Authors Wiig, Elisabeth H, Jones, Stephanie S, Wiig, Erik D
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published ASHA 01.01.1996
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0161-1461
1558-9129
DOI10.1044/0161-1461.2701.21

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Computer-based and standard administrations of the Test of Word Knowledge (TOWK)-Level 2 core subtests (Word Definitions, Synonyms, Figurative Usage, Multiple Contexts) (Wiig & Secord, 1992) were compared for 30 subjects with learning disabilities. Half completed the computer-based version first and half the standard version first. Three weeks later, subjects were given either the standard or computer-based version in a counterbalanced design. The total, receptive, and expressive composites and three subtest means were highest for the standard administration ( p <.05). Correlation coefficients ( r ) ranged from .81 to .88 for composites ( p <.01). Confidence intervals (at 90% level) overlapped in 93% for the total, 97% for the receptive, and 93% for the expressive composite. Paired total scores were within the same diagnostic category (below or at/above normal) for 87%, receptive for 83%, and expressive for 90% of the subjects. Differenes in task formats influenced the results, indicating the need for independent norms for computer-based adaptations of standardized language tests.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0161-1461
1558-9129
DOI:10.1044/0161-1461.2701.21