Justice in Black and White: Race, Perceptions of Fairness, and Diffuse Support for the Judicial System in a Southern State

The effective operation of the American judicial system requires the public's confidence and support. High-profile events, most notably the Rodney King incident and O.J. Simpson trials, have called into question the confidence that black and white Americans have in the courts. Contemporary case...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Justice system journal Vol. 25; no. 2; pp. 159 - 182
Main Authors Overby, L. Marvin, Brown, Robert D., Bruce, John M., Smith, Charles E., Winkle, John W.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Williamsburg Taylor & Francis 01.05.2004
National Center for State Courts
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The effective operation of the American judicial system requires the public's confidence and support. High-profile events, most notably the Rodney King incident and O.J. Simpson trials, have called into question the confidence that black and white Americans have in the courts. Contemporary cases (e.g., Kobe Bryant and Michael Jackson) may continue the trend. While there is abundant anecdotal evidence, rigorous empirical analysis has been limited to studies of the U.S. Supreme Court. In this article, we explore black-white differences in assessments of a state judicial system. Our findings suggest that while black and white citizens agree on many matters, there are strong differences related to the overall fairness, and the impartiality of important actors, in the judicial system. That these discrepancies remain even after controlling for other important factors suggests that there are significant, racially based differences in how blacks and whites evaluate the dispensation of justice.
ISSN:0098-261X
2327-7556
DOI:10.1080/0098261X.2004.10767716