Advanced Multimodal Methods for Cranial Pseudo-CT Generation Validated by IMRT and VMAT Radiation Therapy Plans

To investigate advanced multimodal methods for pseudo-computed tomography (CT) generation from standard magnetic resonance imaging sequences and to validate the results by intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans. We present 2 novel methods that...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics Vol. 102; no. 4; pp. 792 - 800
Main Authors Speier, Christoph, Pileggi, Giampaolo, Izquierdo-Garcia, David, Catana, Ciprian, Sharp, Gregory C., Spadea, Maria Francesca, Bert, Christoph, Seco, Joao
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 15.11.2018
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To investigate advanced multimodal methods for pseudo-computed tomography (CT) generation from standard magnetic resonance imaging sequences and to validate the results by intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans. We present 2 novel methods that employ key techniques to enhance pseudo-CTs and investigate the effect on image quality and applicability for IMRT and VMAT planning. The data set contains CT and magnetic resonance image scans from 15 patients who underwent cranial radiation therapy. For each patient, pseudo-CTs of the head were generated with a patch-based and a voxel-based algorithm. The accuracy of the pseudo-CTs in comparison to clinical CTs was evaluated by mean absolute error, bias, and the Dice coefficient (of bone). IMRT and VMAT plans were created for each patient. Dose distributions were calculated with both the pseudo-CT and the clinical CT scans and compared by gamma tests, dose-volume histograms, and isocenter doses. The generated pseudo-CTs exhibited average mean absolute errors of 118.7 ± 10.4 HU for the voxel-based algorithm and 73.0 ± 6.4 HU for the patch-based algorithm. The dose calculations were in good agreement and showed gamma test (2 mm, 2%) pass rates for both beam setups (IMRT and VMAT) of over 99% for 14 patients and over 98% for 1 patient. We showed that the key techniques of our 2 novel algorithms advance the quality of pseudo-CT significantly and generate very competitive pseudo-CTs compared with previously published methods. This quality was confirmed by low dose error in comparison to the ground-truth CT. With the achieved level of accuracy, our patch-based algorithm especially is a candidate for clinical routine use in IMRT and VMAT planning.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0360-3016
1879-355X
DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.06.024