Discovery of potent α-glucosidase inhibitor flavonols: Insights into mechanism of action through inhibition kinetics and docking simulations

[Display omitted] •A set of flavonols were tested for their α-glucosidase inhibition.•Glycosylation of the C-3 hydroxyl decreased the activity.•Galloyl substitution to sugar unit increased the α-glucosidase inhibitory effect.•Molecular docking of 1, 2, 7–9 predicted good fit and high affinity to the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBioorganic chemistry Vol. 79; pp. 257 - 264
Main Authors Şöhretoğlu, Didem, Sari, Suat, Barut, Burak, Özel, Arzu
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.09.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:[Display omitted] •A set of flavonols were tested for their α-glucosidase inhibition.•Glycosylation of the C-3 hydroxyl decreased the activity.•Galloyl substitution to sugar unit increased the α-glucosidase inhibitory effect.•Molecular docking of 1, 2, 7–9 predicted good fit and high affinity to the enzyme. Beside other pharmaceutical benefits, flavonoids are known for their potent α-glucosidase inhibition. In the present study, we investigated α-glucosidase inhibitory effects of structurally related 11 flavonols, among which quercetin-3-O-(3″-O-galloyl)-β-galactopyranoside (8) and quercetin 3-O-(6″-O-galloyl)-β-glucopyranoside (9) showed significant inhibition compared to the positive control, acarbose, with IC50 values of 0.97 ± 0.02 and 1.35 ± 0.06 µM, respectively. It was found that while sugar substitution to C3-OH of C ring reduced the α-glucosidase inhibitory effect, galloyl substitution to these sugar units increased it. An enzyme kinetics analysis revealed that 7 was competitive, whereas 1, 2, 8, and 9 were uncompetitive inhibitors. In the light of these findings, we performed molecular docking studies to predict their inhibition mechanisms at atomic level.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0045-2068
1090-2120
DOI:10.1016/j.bioorg.2018.05.010