Discovery of potent α-glucosidase inhibitor flavonols: Insights into mechanism of action through inhibition kinetics and docking simulations
[Display omitted] •A set of flavonols were tested for their α-glucosidase inhibition.•Glycosylation of the C-3 hydroxyl decreased the activity.•Galloyl substitution to sugar unit increased the α-glucosidase inhibitory effect.•Molecular docking of 1, 2, 7–9 predicted good fit and high affinity to the...
Saved in:
Published in | Bioorganic chemistry Vol. 79; pp. 257 - 264 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Elsevier Inc
01.09.2018
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | [Display omitted]
•A set of flavonols were tested for their α-glucosidase inhibition.•Glycosylation of the C-3 hydroxyl decreased the activity.•Galloyl substitution to sugar unit increased the α-glucosidase inhibitory effect.•Molecular docking of 1, 2, 7–9 predicted good fit and high affinity to the enzyme.
Beside other pharmaceutical benefits, flavonoids are known for their potent α-glucosidase inhibition. In the present study, we investigated α-glucosidase inhibitory effects of structurally related 11 flavonols, among which quercetin-3-O-(3″-O-galloyl)-β-galactopyranoside (8) and quercetin 3-O-(6″-O-galloyl)-β-glucopyranoside (9) showed significant inhibition compared to the positive control, acarbose, with IC50 values of 0.97 ± 0.02 and 1.35 ± 0.06 µM, respectively. It was found that while sugar substitution to C3-OH of C ring reduced the α-glucosidase inhibitory effect, galloyl substitution to these sugar units increased it. An enzyme kinetics analysis revealed that 7 was competitive, whereas 1, 2, 8, and 9 were uncompetitive inhibitors. In the light of these findings, we performed molecular docking studies to predict their inhibition mechanisms at atomic level. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0045-2068 1090-2120 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.bioorg.2018.05.010 |