Schools for the future: subtle shift or seismic change?

This paper centres around a discussion of the design and rebuild of a secondary school in Birmingham (England) as part of the Building Schools of the Future (BSF) Programme. The BSF Programme was influenced by a vision of future schooling in which learning environments are transformed by the integra...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inTechnology, pedagogy and education Vol. 23; no. 1; pp. 19 - 37
Main Authors Sutherland, Rosamund, Sutherland, Joanna, Fellner, Chris, Siccolo, Matt, Clark, Lindsey
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Routledge 02.01.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1475-939X
1747-5139
DOI10.1080/1475939X.2013.869975

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This paper centres around a discussion of the design and rebuild of a secondary school in Birmingham (England) as part of the Building Schools of the Future (BSF) Programme. The BSF Programme was influenced by a vision of future schooling in which learning environments are transformed by the integration of ICT into teaching and learning practices. The vision behind the BSF Programme suggests that schools of the future will embrace a learner-centred and skills-centred perspective and that the boundaries between home and school learning will become eroded. By contrast, the vision of the senior management team of this particular Birmingham shool emphasised the importance of subject-based learning (for example mathematics, science, English), and was moving away from a skills-based approach to the curriculum. The paper draws on Young and Muller's three scenarios for future schooling, in order to provide a framework for analysing the design of Park View School in Birmingham. The authors argue that the design of the new school is leading to new practices of teaching and learning that had not been anticipated by the senior management team. However, the BSF vision for how ICT would become embedded into the life of the school had not been realised at the time of writing this paper, and this, the authors argue, is because this vision is at odds with a focus on subject-based learning.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1475-939X
1747-5139
DOI:10.1080/1475939X.2013.869975