Increased early acute cellular rejection events in hepatitis C-positive heart transplantation

Increased utilization of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive donors has increased transplantation rates. However, high levels of viremia have been documented in recipients of viremic donors. There is a knowledge gap in how transient viremia may impact acute cellular rejections (ACRs). In this study, 50...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of heart and lung transplantation Vol. 39; no. 11; pp. 1199 - 1207
Main Authors Gidea, Claudia G., Narula, Navneet, Reyentovich, Alex, Fargnoli, Anthony, Smith, Deane, Pavone, Jennifer, Lewis, Tyler, Karpe, Hannah, Stachel, Maxine, Rao, Shaline, Moreira, Andre, Saraon, Tajinderpal, Raimann, Jochen, Kon, Zachary, Moazami, Nader
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.11.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Increased utilization of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive donors has increased transplantation rates. However, high levels of viremia have been documented in recipients of viremic donors. There is a knowledge gap in how transient viremia may impact acute cellular rejections (ACRs). In this study, 50 subjects received hearts from either viremic or non-viremic donors. The recipients of viremic donors were classified as nucleic acid amplification testing (NAT)+ group, and the remaining were classified as NAT-. All patients were monitored for viremia levels. Endomyocardial biopsies were performed through 180 days, evaluating the incidence of ACRs. A total of 50 HCV-naive recipients received hearts between 2018 and 2019. A total of 22 patients (44%) who received transplants from viremic donors developed viremia at a mean period of 7.2 ± 0.2 days. At that time, glecaprevir/pibrentasvir was initiated. In the viremia period (<56 days), 14 of 22 NAT+ recipients (64%) had ACR vs 5 of 28 NAT- group (18%) (p = 0.001). Through 180 days, 17 of 22 NAT+ recipients (77%) had a repeat rejection biopsy vs 12 of 28 NAT– recipients (43%) (p = 0.02). NAT+ biopsies demonstrated disparity of ACR distribution: negative, low-grade, and high-grade ACR in 84%, 12%, and 4%, respectively, vs 96%, 3%, and 1%, respectively, in the NAT– group (p = 0.03). The median time to first event was 26 (interquartile range [IQR]: 8–45) in the NAT+ group vs 65 (IQR: 44–84) days in the NAT–. Time to first event risk model revealed that NAT+ recipients had a significantly higher rate of ACR occurrences, adjusting for demographics (p = 0.004). Transient levels of viremia contributed to higher rates and severity of ACRs. Further investigation into the mechanisms of early immune activation in NAT+ recipients is required.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1053-2498
1557-3117
DOI:10.1016/j.healun.2020.06.022